Page 172 - Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses, 7th Edition
P. 172

138   Chapter 2


            19.  Galisteo AM, Cano MR, Morales JL, et al. Kinematics in horses at   39.  Pfau T, Robilliard JJ, Weller R, et al. Assessment of mild hindlimb
               the trot before and after induced forelimb supporting lameness.   lameness during over ground locomotion using linear discrimi­
                                                                  nant analysis of inertial sensor data. Equine  Vet J 2007;39:
               Equine Vet J Suppl 1997;23:97–101.
  VetBooks.ir  20.  Galisteo AM, Cano MR, Morales JL, et al. The influence of speed   40.  Pfau  T, Spicer‐Jenkins C, Smith RK, et  al. Identifying optimal
                                                                  407–413.
               and height at the withers on the kinematics of sound horses at the
               hand‐led trot. Vet Res Commun 1998;22:415–423.
                                                                  parameters for quantification of changes in pelvic movement
            21.  Greve L, Dyson S.  An investigation of the relationship between
               hindlimb lameness and saddle slip. Equine Vet J 2013;45:570–577.  asymmetry as a response to diagnostic analgesia in the hindlimbs
                                                                  of horses. Equine Vet J 2014;46:759– 763.
            22.  Greve L, Dyson S. The interrelationship of lameness, saddle slip   41.  Pfau T, Jennings C, Mitchell H, et al. Lungeing on hard and soft
               and back shape in the general sports horse population. Equine Vet   surfaces: movement symmetry of trotting horses considered sound
               J 2014;46:687–694.                                 by their owners. Equine Vet J 2016;48:83–89.
            23.  Greve L, Dyson S. Saddle fit and management: an investigation of   42.  Pfau T, Noordwijk K, Sepulveda Caviedes MR, et al. Head, with­
               the association with equine thoracolumbar asymmetries, horse   ers and pelvic movement asymmetry and their relative timing in
               and rider health. Equine Vet J 2015;47;415–421.    trot in racing  Thoroughbreds in training. Equine  Vet J
            24.  Greve L, Dyson S. Body lean angle in sound dressage horses in‐  2018;50:117–124
               hand, on the lunge, and ridden. Vet J 2016;217:52–57.  43.  Pilsworth R, Rossdale PD. Is it poor or loss of performance? The
            25.  Greve L, Pfau T, Dyson S. Thoracolumbar movement in sound   science of explanation. EVJ 1998;30:364–365.
               horses trotting in straight lines in hand and on the lunge and the   44.  Poore LAB, Licka TL. A quantitative review of the Equinalysis
               relationship with hind limb symmetry  or asymmetry.  Vet J   system for equine locomotion analysis. J Equine  Vet Sci
               2017;220:95–104.                                   2011;31:717–721.
            26.  Hammarberg M, Egenvall A, Pfau T, et  al. Rater agreement of   45.  Poucelot P, Degueurce C, Audigié F, et al. Kinematic analysis of the
               visual lameness assessment in horses during lungeing. Equine Vet   locomotion symmetry of sound horses at a slow trot. EVJ Suppl
               J 2016;48:78–92.                                   1997;23:93–96.
            27.  Janicek  J, Lopes  MAF, Wilson DA,  et  al. Hindlimb  kinematics   46.  Rhodin M, Roepstorff L, French A, et al. Head and pelvic move­
               before and after laser fibrotomy in horses with fibrotic myopathy.   ment asymmetry during lungeing in horses with symmetrical
               Equine Vet J 2012;44:126–131.                      movement on the straight. Equine Vet J 2016;48:315–320.
            28.  Keegan KG, Wilson DA, Smith BK, et al. Changes in kinematic vari­  47.  Roepstorff L, Egenvall A, Rhodin M, et al. Kinetics and kinemat­
               ables observed during pressure‐induced forelimb lameness in adult   ics of the horse comparing left and right rising trot. Equine Vet J
               horses trotting on a treadmill. Am J Vet Res 2000;61:612–619.  2010;41:292–296.
            29.  Keegan KG, Yonezawa Y, Pai PF, et  al. Evaluation of a sensor   48.  Ross M. Lameness in horses: basic facts before starting. In
               based system  of equine  motion analysis  for the  detection  and   Diagnosis and Management of Lameness in the Horse, 2nd ed.
               quantification of forelimb and hindlimb lameness in horses. Am J   Ross M, Dyson S eds. Elsevier, St. Louis, MO, 2010;3–8.
               Vet Res 2004;65:665–670.                        49.  Rubin CT, Lanyon LE. Limb mechanics as a function of speed and
            30.  Kramer J, Keegan KG, Wilson DA, et al. Kinematics of the equine   gait. A study of functional strains in the radius and tibia of horse
               hindlimb in trotting horses after induced distal tarsal lameness   and dog J Exp Biol 1982;101:187–211.
               and distal tarsal anesthesia. Am J Vet Res 2000;61:1031–1036.  50.  Starke  SD,  May SA.  Veterinary  student  competence  in equine
            31.  lameness. (n.d.). Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved May 4,   lameness recognition and assessment: a mixed methods study. Vet
               2018 from Dictionary.com website http://www.dictionary.com/  Rec 2017;181:1–8.
               browse/lameness                                 51.  Starke SD, May SA, Pfau T. Understanding hind limb lameness
            32.  Liautard  A. Lameness of Horses  –  and  –  Diseases of the   signs  in  horses  using  simple  rigid  body  mechanics.  J  Biomech
               Locomotory Apparatus.  1888. William  R.  Jenkins, Veterinary   2015;48:3323–3331.
               Publisher and Bookseller, New York, pg. 8       52.  Swor TM, Schneider RK, Ross MW, et al. Injury to the origin of
            33.  Licka T, Kapaun M, Peham C. Influence of rider on lameness in   the gastrocnemius muscle as a possible cause of lameness in four
               trotting horses. Equine Vet J 2004;36:734–736.     horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;219:215–219
            34.  Lopes MA, Dearo AC, Lee A, et al. An attempt to detect lameness   53.  Weishaupt  MA. Compensatory  load  redistribution  in  forelimb
               in galloping horses by use of body‐mounted sensors. Am J Vet Res   and hind limb lameness. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 2005;51:
               2016;77:1121–1131.                                 141–148.
            35.  May SA, Wyn‐Jones G. Identification of hindleg lameness. Equine   54.  Weishaupt MA, Wiestner T, Hogg HP, et al. Compensatory load
               Vet J 1987;19:185–188.                             redistribution of horses with induced weight bearing hind limb
            36.  McGee S. Chapter 7 – Stance and gait. In Evidence‐Based Physical   lameness trotting on a treadmill. Equine Vet J 2004;36:727–733.
               Diagnosis, 4th ed., Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA, 2018;45–52.  55.  Weishaupt MA, Wiestner T, Hogg HP, et al. Compensatory load
            37.  Peham C, Licka T, Mayr A, et al. Speed dependency of motion   redistribution of horses with induced forelimb lameness trotting
               pattern consistency. J Biomech 1998;31:769–772.    on a treadmill. Vet J 2006;171:135–146.
            38.  Peham C, Licka T, Girtler D, et al. Hindlimb lameness: clinical   56.  Witte TH, Knill K, Wilson AM. Determination of peak vertical
               judgement versus computerised symmetry measurement. Vet Rec   ground reaction force from duty factor in the horse (Equus cabal-
               2001;148:750–752.                                  lus) J Exp Biol 2004;207:3639–3648.
   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177