Page 176 - Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses, 7th Edition
P. 176

142   Chapter 2




  VetBooks.ir













                          A                                        C







































                          B                                           D

                             TM
            Figure 2.130.  The Q  (hardware) with Lameness Locator®   pastern in pouch. (C) Pelvic accelerometer attached with foam pad
            (software) on standing horse. (A) Head accelerometer attached to   and rubberized grip device. (D) Instrumented horse in motion.
            head bumper. (B) Right forelimb gyroscope attached to dorsal
            frequency (the expected vertical movement). 2,52  Outlier   pelvis (for hindlimb lameness evaluation) position.
            data is detected and discarded. Simple, experimentally   Location of lameness to limb (or limbs) and timing of
            determined reference range estimates between likeli­  peak lameness within the stride phase of a limb are
            hood of “lameness” and “not lameness,” and the strength   determined by the association of head and pelvic move­
            (“weak,” “moderate,” and “strong”) of this evidence,   ment to movement (angular velocity) of the right fore­
            are presented to the veterinary user. Results are stand­  limb.  All assessment of amplitude of lameness is
            ardized to normal expected vertical movement (the   generated by data from the head and pelvis sensors, and
              periodic component of vertical movement at twice stride   the right forelimb sensor is simply a stride event marker.
            frequency) to accommodate for large differences in body   Lameness evaluation results are reported in a graphi­
            size  or  natural  “boundingness”  in  trot.  Lameness  is   cal display that depicts amplitude of impact and propul­
            detected and quantified by reporting means and stand­  sion asymmetry  in each stride. Lameness  can be
            ard deviations of maximum and minimum height differ­  evaluated with the horse trotting in a straight line, while
            ences of the head (for forelimb lameness evaluation) and   lunging (at the trot), and trotting under saddle. Response
   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181