Page 181 - Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses, 7th Edition
P. 181

Examination for Lameness  147


                               Quantification of Asymmetry                      Quantification of Asymmetry
                     Stride Rate: 1.6      Strides Assessed (fore/hind): 22/21  Stride Rate: 1.6  Strides Assessed (fore/hind): 19/19
                       Forelimb Strides
                                                                        Forelimb Strides
                                                                                                 Hindlimb Strides
                                                Hindlimb Strides
  VetBooks.ir   60 40  Right Fore Lameness  –30  Left Hind Lameness  Right Hind Lameness  30 20  60  Right Fore Lameness  –30  Left Hind Lameness  Right Hind Lameness  30 20
                                                      Pushoff
                                            Pushoff
                                                                                              Pushoff
                                                                                                        Pushoff
                        Midstance
                                                                          Midstance
                                                                 40
                                        –20
                                                                                          –20
                20  Pushoff   Impact   – Diff Max (mm)  –10  10  + Diff Max (mm)  20  Pushoff  Impact  – Diff Max (mm)  –10  10  + Diff Max (mm)
               Diff Min (mm)  0          0                  0   Diff Min (mm)  0           0                  0
               –20                      –10                 10   –20                      –10                 10
                               Pushoff                               Impact     Pushoff
                    Impact
               –40      Midstance      – Diff Min (mm)  –20  20  + Diff Min (mm)  –40  Midstance  – Diff Min (mm)  –20  20  + Diff Min (mm)
                      Left Fore Lameness                                Left Fore Lameness
               –60                      –30  Impact   Impact  30  –60                     –30  Impact   Impact  30
                –60  –40  –20  0  20  40  60  0  5  10  15  20  0  5  10  15  20  –60  –40  –20  0  20  40  60  0  5  10  15  20  0  5  10  15  20
                       Diff Max (mm)         Stride    Stride            Diff Max (mm)        Stride    Stride
                                   Lameness Metrics                                 Lameness Metrics
               Thresholds for Max/Min Head: ±6 mm  Thresholds for Max/Min Pelvis: ±3 mm  Thresholds for Max/Min Head: ±6 mm  Thresholds for Max/Min Pelvis: ±3 mm
               Diff Max Head:  Mean:  10.2 mm  SD:  5.8 mm  Diff Max Pelvis:  Mean:  11.7 mm  SD:  3.3 mm  Diff Max Head:  Mean:  –12.8 mm  SD:  12.4 mm  Diff Max Pelvis:  Mean:  –11.6 mm  SD:  5.2 mm
               Diff Min Head:  Mean:  10.0 mm  SD:  7.2 mm  Diff Min Pelvis:  Mean:  3.2 mm  SD:  4.5 mm  Diff Min Head:  Mean:  –13.3 mm  SD:  6.1 mm  Diff Min Pelvis:  Mean:  –0.8 mm  SD:  5.8 mm
               Threshold for Total Diff Head: 8.5 mm            Threshold for Total Diff Head: 8.5 mm
               Total Diff Head (Vector Sum):  14.3 mm           Total Diff Head (Vector Sum):  18.4 mm
                   Q Score (fore):  R 14.3 Imp  Q Score (hind):  R 11.7 Push / R 3.2 Imp  Q Score (fore):  L 18.4 Imp  Q Score (hind):  L 11.6 Push / L 0.8 Imp
             Figure 2.136.  Lameness Locator® reports of multiple limb   forelimb lameness. These are examples of the first part of the law
             lameness. Left report: Right hindlimb pushoff only, no impact   of sides: primary hindlimb lameness with compensatory (false)
             lameness, and ipsilateral (right) forelimb lameness. Right report:   ipsilateral forelimb lameness.
             Left hindlimb pushoff only, no impact lameness, and ipsilateral (left)
                               Quantification of Asymmetry                      Quantification of Asymmetry
                     Stride Rate: 1.4      Strides Assessed (fore/hind): 39/39  Stride Rate: 1.5  Strides Assessed (fore/hind): 27/27
                      Forelimb Strides         Hindlimb Strides         Forelimb Strides         Hindlimb Strides
               60                       –30  Left Hind Lameness  Right Hind Lameness  30  60  –30  Left Hind Lameness  Right Hind Lameness  30
                                            Pushoff   Pushoff                                 Pushoff   Pushoff
                      Right Fore Lameness                               Right Fore Lameness
               40       Midstance       –20                 20   40       Midstance      –20                 20
                    Pushoff   Impact   – Diff Max (mm)       + Diff Max (mm)  Pushoff  Impact  – Diff Max (mm)  + Diff Max (mm)
               20                       –10                 10   20                      –10                  10
              Diff Min (mm)  0           0                  0   Diff Min (mm)  0          0                   0
               –20                      –10                 10   –20                     –10                  10
                              Pushoff                                Impact     Pushoff
                    Impact
               –40                     – Diff Min (mm)       + Diff Min (mm)  –40        – Diff Min (mm)       + Diff Min (mm)
                        Midstance       –20                 20            Midstance      –20                  20
                      Left Fore Lameness                                Left Fore Lameness
               –60                      –30  Impact   Impact  30  –60                    –30  Impact    Impact  30
                –60  –40  –20  0  20  40  60  0  10  20  30  40  0  10  20  30  40  –60  –40  –20  0  20  40  60  0  10  20  0  10  20
                       Diff Max (mm)        Stride     Stride            Diff Max (mm)        Stride    Stride
                                  Lameness Metrics                                  Lameness Metrics
              Thresholds for Max/Min Head: ±6 mm  Thresholds for Max/Min Pelvis: ±3 mm  Thresholds for Max/Min Head: ±6 mm  Thresholds for Max/Min Pelvis: ±3 mm
              Diff Max Head:  Mean:  3.0 mm  SD:  7.5 mm  Diff Max Pelvis:  Mean:  0.0 mm  SD:  4.5 mm  Diff Max Head:  Mean:  –8.0 mm  SD:  6.4 mm  Diff Max Pelvis:  Mean:  0.4 mm  SD:  2.6 mm
              Diff Min Head:  Mean:  12.5 mm  SD:  8.3 mm  Diff Min Pelvis:  Mean:  5.2 mm  SD:  2.6 mm  Diff Min Head:  Mean:  –21.6 mm  SD:  7.7 mm  Diff Min Pelvis:  Mean:  –12.1 mm  SD:  4.4 mm
              Threshold for Total Diff Head: 8.5 mm             Threshold for Total Diff Head: 8.5 mm
              Total Diff Head (Vector Sum):  12.8 mm            Total Diff Head (Vector Sum):  23.0 mm
                   Q Score (fore):  R 12.8 Mid  Q Score (hind):  R 0.0 Push / R 5.2 Imp  Q Score (fore):  L 23.0 Imp  Q Score (hind):  R 0.4 Push / L 12.1 lmp
             Figure 2.137.  Lameness Locator® reports of multiple limb   explained by either the first or second part of the law of sides, either
             lameness. Left report: Right hindlimb impact only, no pushoff   a primary hindlimb lameness with compensatory ipsilateral forelimb
             lameness, and ipsilateral (right) forelimb lameness. Right report:   lameness or primary forelimb lameness with compensatory
             Left hindlimb impact only, no pushoff lameness, and ipsilateral (left)   ipsilateral hindlimb impact lameness.
             forelimb lameness. This multiple limb pattern can be equally
                hindlimb diagnosis, 11% had both a forelimb and a   A  complicated explanation of primary hindlimb
                hindlimb diagnosis, and 45% had only a forelimb    lameness, with compensatory ipsilateral forelimb
                diagnosis, about 1/3 being a bilateral forelimb lame­  lameness, and secondary contralateral hindlimb lack
                ness condition.  Also, a relatively high percentage   of impact lameness is required to fully explain this
                (9%) of these cases had diagnosis of abnormality not   pattern. However, this type of multiple limb lameness
                located within the limbs. When seeing this type of   had a relatively high rate (71%) of definitive diagno­
                multiple limb lameness, it was equally likely for the   sis, with 35% ultimately diagnosed with only a
                primarily  lameness  to  be  in  the  forelimb  or  in  the   hindlimb problem, 25% with both a hindlimb and
                hindlimb.                                          forelimb problem, 20% with only a forelimb problem
             4.  Forelimb lameness with ipsilateral hindlimb lame­  (but bilateral in 100%), and 20% with a non‐limb
                ness that is decreased pushoff and contralateral   diagnosis. This type of multiple limb lameness pattern
                hindlimb lameness that is decreased impact         had the highest percentage of  “other” diagnosis
                (Figure 2.138).                                    (problem found but not in the limbs).
                  This type occurred rarely. It was seen in only 4%   5.  Forelimb lameness with contralateral hindlimb lame­
                of all multiple limb cases. There is no easy, compensa­  ness that is decreased pushoff and decreased impact
                tory‐ or secondary‐only explanation of this pattern.   (Figure 2.139).
   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186