Page 189 - Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses, 7th Edition
P. 189
Examination for Lameness 155
Sitting the trot, when performed correctly, has the 8. Bell RP, Reed SK, Schoonover MJ, et al. Associations of force
least artifactual effect on assessment of lameness. A rider plate and body‐mounted inertial sensor measurements for
identification of hind limb lameness in horses. Am J Vet Res
VetBooks.ir up and forward when the inside (left) forelimb is weight 9. Bobbert MF, Gòmez‐Alvarez CB, van Weeren PR, et al. Validation of
riding to the left and posting on the right forelimb moves
2016;77:337–345.
bearing. This movement can exacerbate an existing pain
vertical ground reaction forces on individual limbs calculated from
ful focus in the inside forelimb, making lameness more kinematics of horse locomotion. J Exp Biol 2017;210:1185–1196.
visible and easily measured. Subsequently, the rider falls 10. Brocklehurst C, Weller R, Pfau T. Effect of turn direction on body
lean angle in the horse in trot and canter. Vet J 2014;199(2):
downward and backward during pushoff of the inside 258–262.
hindlimb. This rider movement opposes the upward 11. Buchner HHF, Savelberg HHCM, Shamhardt HC, et al. Kinematics
thrust of the horse’s inside hindlimb, preventing or less of treadmill vs overground locomotion in horses. Vet Q Suppl
ening pelvic rise. Less pelvic rise after pushoff on the 1994;2:87–90
inside hindlimb will be measured as a hindlimb pushoff‐ 12. Buchner HHF, Savelberg HHCM, Schamhardt HC, et al. Bilateral
lameness in horse—a kinematic study. Vet Q 1995;17:103–105.
type lameness. This later effect of posting is highly pre 13. Buchner HHF, Salvelberg HHCM, Schamhardt HC, et al. Limb
dictable and definitive. Horses without hindlimb pain movement adaptations in horses with experimentally induced
during pushoff will frequently measure with inside fore‐ or hindlimb lameness. Equine Vet J 1996;28: 63–70.
hindlimb pushoff‐type (lack of impulsion) lameness. 14. Buchner HHF, Savelberg HHCM, Schamhardt HC, et al. Head
and trunk movement adaptations in horses with experimen
Horses with existing pushoff lameness in the inside tally induced fore or hindlimb lameness. Equine Vet J 1996;28:
hindlimb will measure with greater lameness. Horses 71–76.
with existing pushoff lameness on the outside hindlimb 15. Buchner HHF, Kübber P, Zohmann E, et al. Sedation and antise
(ipsilateral to the posting forelimb) will measure with dation as tools in equine lameness examination. Equine Vet J
Suppl 1999;30:227–230.
lesser lameness or the existing pushoff lameness will be 16. Buchner HHF, Obermüller S, Scheidl M. Body centre of mass
completely masked. The effect of posting on lameness movement in the sound horse. Vet J 2000;160:225–234.
will be additive to the effect of direction of movement 17. Crevier‐Denoix N, Munoz‐Nates F, Camus M, et al. Comparison
and to surfaces characteristics, which can be significant of peak vertical force and vertical impulse in the inside and outside
hind limbs in horses circling on a soft surface, at trot and canter.
when riding in small circles. Lameness Locator® AIDES, Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2017;20(supp1):51–51.
taking into consideration both direction of movement, doi: 10.1080/10255842.2017.1382856.
surface characteristics, and rider activity, remind the user 18. Donnell JR, Frisbie DD, Keng MR, et al. Comparison of subjective
about these artifactual effects. Amount of artifactual lameness evaluation, force platforms and an inertial sensor system
to identify mild lameness in an equine osteoarthritis model. Vet J
effect will depend on amplitude of rider posting, which, 2015;206:136–142.
depending on the individual rider, may differ when riding 19. Drevemo S, Johnston C, Roepstorff L, et al. Nerve block and
in opposite directions. The combination of artifactual intra‐articular anesthesia of the forelimb in the sound horse.
effects from direction of movement, surface characteris Equine Vet J Suppl 1999;30:266–269.
tics, and rider activity complicates lameness evaluation 20. Eliashar E, McGuigan MP, Wilson AM. Relationship of foot con
formation and force applied to the navicular bone of sound horses
under saddle. However, similar to evaluation of lameness at the trot. Equine Vet J 2004;36:431–435.
while lunging, when lameness is consistently measured 21. Fiske‐Jacksonn A. Objective lameness assessment: can it really tell
during in‐hand straight‐line evaluation, under‐saddle us anything different? Livestock 2015;20:173–178.
evaluation with the rider sitting the trot uncommonly 22. Fuller CJ, Bladon BM, Driver AJ, et al. The intra‐ and inter‐asses
sor reliability of measurement of functional outcome by lameness
brings out a lameness in a different limb entirely, and for scoring in horses. Vet J 2006;171:281–286.
lameness measured with the rider sitting the trot, evalu 23. Gingerich DA, Auer JA, Fackelman GE. Force plate studies on the
ation for lameness with the rider posting uncommonly effect of exogenous hyaluronic acid on joint function in equine
arthritis. J Vet Pharmacol Therap 1979;2:291–298.
brings out non‐artifactual lameness in a different limb. 24. Hammarberg M, Egenvall A, Pfau T, et al. Rater agreement of
Nevertheless, especially when lameness is not consist visual lameness assessment in horses during lungeing. Equine Vet
ently measurable in hand, evaluation of lameness under J 2016;48:78–92.
saddle is a valuable technique to assess some lameness 25. Hewetson M, Christley RM, Hunt ID, et al. Investigations of the
conditions in certain situations. reliability of observational gait analysis for the assessment of
lameness in horses. Vet Rec 2006;158:852–857.
26. Hu HH, MacAllister CG, Payton ME, et al. Evaluation of the
analgesic effects of phenylbutazone administered at a high and
References low dosage in horses with chronic lameness. Am J Vet Res
2005;226:414–417.
1. Arkell M, Archer RM, Guitian FJ, et al. Evidence of bias affecting 27. Ishihara A, Bertone AL, Rajaala‐Schultz PJ. Association between
the interpretation of the results of local anesthetic nerve blocks subjective lameness grade and kinetic gait parameters in horses
when assessing lameness in horses. Vet Rec 2006;159:346–349. with experimentally induced Forelimb lameness. Am J Vet Res
2. Audigié F, Pourcelot P, Degueurce C, et al. Fourier analysis of 2005;66:1805–1815.
trunk displacements: a method to identify the lame limb inn trot 28. Ishihara A, Reed SM, Rajala‐Schultz PJ, et al. Use of kinetic gait
ting horses. J Biomech 2002;35:1173–1182. analysis for detection, quantification, and differentiation of hind
3. Azevedo MS, Córte FDDL, Brass KE, et al. The use of xylazine or limb lameness and spinal ataxia in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc
acepromazine does not interfere in the lameness evaluation by 2009;234:644–651.
inertial sensors. J Equine Vet Sci 2015;35:27–30. 29. Kaido M, Kilborne AH, Sizemore JL, et al. Effects of repetition
4. Back W, MacAllister CG, van Heel MCV, et al. Vertical frontlimb within trials and frequency of trial session on quantitative param
ground reaction forces of sound and lame Warmbloods differ eters of vertical force peak in horses with naturally occurring
from those in Quarter horses. J Equine Vet Sci 2007;27:123–129. lameness. Am J Vet Res 2016;77:756–765.
5. Barrey E. Investigation of the vertical hoof force distribution in 30. Keegan KG, Wilson DA, Wilson DJ, et al. Evaluation of mild lame
the equine forelimb with an instrumented horseboot. EVJ Suppl ness in horses trotting on a treadmill by clinicians and interns or
1990;9:35–38. residents and correlation of their assessments with kinematic gait
6. Barrey E, Desbrosse F. Lameness detection using an accelerometric analysis. Am J Vet Res 1998;59:1370–1377.
device. Pferdeheilkunde 1996;12:617–622. 31. Keegan KG, Arafat S, Skubic M, et al. Detection of lameness and
7. Barrey E, Hermelin M, Vaudelin JL, et al. Utilization of an accel determination of the affected forelimb in horses by use of continu
erometric device in equine gait analysis. Equine Vet J Suppl 1994; ous wavelet transformation and neural network classification of
17:7–12. kinematic data. Am J Vet Res 2003;64:1376–1381.
