Page 190 - Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses, 7th Edition
P. 190
156 Chapter 2
32. Keegan KG, Yonezawa Y, Pai PF, et al. Evaluation of a sensor 54. Pfau T, Robilliard JJ, Weller R, et al. Assessment of mild hindlimb
based system of equine motion analysis for the detection and lameness during over ground locomotion using linear discriminant
analysis of inertial sensor data. Equine Vet J 2007;39:407–413.
quantification of forelimb and hindlimb lameness in horses. Am J
VetBooks.ir 33. Keegan KG, Dent EV, Wilson DA, et al. Repeatability of subjective 55. Pfau T, Starke SD, Troester S, et al. Estimation of vertical tuber
Vet Res 2004;65:665–670.
coxae movement in the horse from a single inertial measurement
unit. Vet J 2013;198:498–503.
evaluation of lameness in horses. Equine Vet J 2010;42:92–97.
34. Keegan KG, Kramer J, Yonezawa Y, et al. Assessment of repeata
bility of a wireless, inertial sensor‐based lameness evaluation sys 56. Pfau T, Spicer‐Jenkins C, Smith RK, et al. Identifying optimal
parameters for quantification of changes in pelvic movement
tem for horses. Am J Vet Res 2011;72:1156–1163. asymmetry as a response to diagnostic analgesia in the hindlimbs
35. Keegan KG, MacAllister CG, Wilson DA, et al. Comparison of an of horses. Equine Vet J 2014;46:759–763.
inertial sensor system with a stationary force plate for evaluation 57. Pfau T, Parkes RS, Burden ER, et al. Movement asymmetry in
of horses with bilateral forelimb lameness. Am J Vet Res working polo horses. Equine Vet J 2015;48:517–522.
2012;73:368–374. 58. Pfau T, Boultbee H, Davis H, et al. Agreement between 2 inertial
36. Keegan KG, Wilson DA, Kramer J, et al. Comparison of a body‐ sensor systems for lameness examinations in horses. Equine Vet
mounted inertial sensor system‐based method with subjective Educ 2016:28:203–208.
evaluation for detection of lameness in horses. Am J Vet Res 59. Pfau T, Jennings C, Mitchell H, et al. Lungeing on hard and soft
2013;74:17–24. surfaces: movement symmetry of trotting horses considered sound
37. Keg PR, Schamhardt HC, van Weeran PR, et al. The effect of diag by their owners. Equine Vet J 2016;48:83–89.
nostic regional nerve blocks in the forelimb on the locomotion of 60. Pfau, T., Sepulveda Caviedes, M. F., McCarthy, R., et al. (2018),
clinically sound horses. Vet Q Suppl 1996;18:106–109. Comparison of visual lameness scores to gait asymmetry in racing
38. Kelmer G, Keegan KG, Kramer J, et al. Computer‐assisted kine Thoroughbreds during trot in‐hand. Equine Vet Educ. doi:10.1111/
matic evaluation of induced compensatory movements resembling eve.12914.
lameness in horses trotting on a treadmill. Am J Vet Res 2005; 61. Rettig JJ, Leelamankong P, Rungsri P, et al. Effect of sedation on
66:646–655. fore‐ and hind limb lameness evaluation using body‐mounted
39. Licka T, Kapaun M, Peham C. Influence of rider on lameness in inertial sensors. Equine Vet J 2016;48:602–607.
trotting horses. Equine Vet J 2004;36:734–736. 62. Robartes H, Fairhurst H, Pfau T. Head and pelvic movement sym
40. Maliye S, Marshall JF. Naturally occurring forelimb lameness in metry in horses during circular motion and in rising trot. Vet J
the horse results in significant compensatory load redistribution 2013;198:52–53.
during trotting. Vet J 2015;204:208–213. 63. Roepstorff L, Egenvall A, Rhodin M, et al. Kinetics and kinemat
41. Maliye S, Marshall JF. Objective assessment of the compensatory ics of the horse comparing left and right rising trot. Equine Vet J
effect on clinical hind limb lameness in horses: 37 cases. J Am Vet 2010;41:292–296.
Med Assoc 2016;249:940–944. 64. Rungsri PK, Staecker W, Leelamankong P, et al. Agreement
42. Maliye S, Voute L, Lund D, et al. An inertial sensor‐based system between a body‐mounted inertial sensors system and subjective
can objectively assess diagnostic anaesthesia of the equine foot. observational analysis when evaluating lameness degree and diag
Equine Vet J Suppl 2013:45;26–30. nostic analgesia response in horses with forelimb lameness.
43. Marshall JF, Lund DG, Voute LC. Use of a wireless, inertial sen Pferdeheilkunde 2014;30:644–6550.
sor‐based system to objectively evaluate flexion tests in the horse. 65. Rungsri PK, Staecker W, Leelamankong P, et al. Use of body‐
Equine Vet J 2012;43:8–11. mounted inertial sensors to objectively evaluate the response to
44. May SA, Wyn‐Jones G. Identification of hindleg lameness. Equine perineural analgesia of the distal limb and intra‐articular analge
Vet J 1987;19:185–188. sia of the distal interphalangeal joint in horses with forelimb
45. McCracken MJ, Kramer J, Keegan KG, et al. Comparison of an lameness. J Equine Vet Sci 2014;34:972 – 977.
inertial sensor system of lameness quantification with subjective 66. Schumacher J, Taintor J, Schumacher J, et al. Function of the
lameness evaluation. Equine Vet J 2012;44:652–656. ramus communicans of the medial and lateral palmar nerves.
46. Merkens HW, Schamhardt HC. Evaluation of equine locomotion Equine Vet J 2013;45:31–35.
during different degrees of experimentally induced lameness I: 67. Starke SD, Willems E, Head M, et al. Proximal hind limb flexion
lameness model and quantification of ground reaction force pat in the horse: effect on movement symmetry and implications for
terns of the limbs. Equine Vet J Suppl 1988;6: 99–106 defining soundness. Equine Vet J 2012;44:657–663.
47. Merkens HW, Schamhardt HC. Evaluation of equine locomotion 68. Symonds KD, MacAllister CG, Erkert RS, et al. Use of force plate
during different degrees of experimentally induced lameness II: analysis to assess the analgesic effects of etodolac in horses with
distribution of ground reaction force patterns of the concurrently navicular syndrome. Am J Vet Res 2006;67:557–561.
loaded limbs. Equine Vet J Suppl 1988;6:107–112 69. Toth F, Schumacher J, Schramme MC, et al. Effects of anesthetizing
48. Moorman VJ, Frisbie DD, Kawcak CE, et al. Effects of sensor individual compartments of the stifle joint in horses with experi
position on kinematic data obtained with an inertial sensor sys mentally induced stifle lameness. Am J Vet Res 2014;75:19–25.
tem during gait analysis of trotting horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 70. Uhlir C, Licka T, Kübber P, et al. Compensatory movements of
2017;250:548–553. horses with a stance phase lameness. Equine Vet J Suppl 1997;23:
49. Oosterlinck M, Pille F, Huppes T, et al. Comparison of pressure 102–105.
plate and force plate gait kinetics in sound Warmbloods at walk 71. van der Water E, Oosterlink M, Pille F. The effect of perineural
and trot. Vet J 2009;186:347–351. anesthesia and handler position in limb loading and hoof balance
50. Oosterlinck M, Pille F, Back W, et al. Use of a stand‐alone pressure on the vertical ground reaction force in sound horses, Equine Vet
plate for the objective determination of forelimb symmetry in J 2016;48:608–612.
sound ponies at walk and trot. Vet J 2010;183:305–309. 72. Weishaupt MA. Compensatory load redistribution in forelimb and
51. Parkes R, Weller R, Groth AM, et al. Evidence of the development hindlimb lameness. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 2005;51:141–148.
of ‘domain‐restricted’ expertise in the recognition of asymmetric 73. Weishaupt MA, Wiestner T, Hogg HP, et al. Compensatory load
motion characteristics of hindlimb lameness in the horse. Equine redistribution of horses with induced weight bearing hind limb
Vet J 2009;41:112–117. lameness trotting on a treadmill. Equine Vet J 2004;36:727–733.
52. Peham C, Licka T, Girtler D, et al. Hindlimb lameness: clinical 74. Weishaupt MA, Wiestner T, Hogg HP, et al. Compensatory load
judgement versus computerised symmetry measurement. Vet Rec redistribution of horses with induced forelimb lameness trotting
2001;148:750–752. on a treadmill. Vet J 2006;171:135–146.
53. Perino VV, Kawcak CE, Firsbie DD, et al. The accuracy and preci 75. Williams GE, Silverman BW, Wilson AM, et al. Disease‐specific
sion of an equine in‐shoe pressure measurement system as a tool changes in equine ground reaction force data documented by use
for gait analysis. J Equine Vet Sci 2007;27:161–166. of principal component analysis. Am J Vet Res 1999;60:549–555.
