Page 938 - Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses, 7th Edition
P. 938

904   Chapter 8


            consistency between batches. Although these  products   There are three commercially available forms of exogenous
            are marketed with “guaranteed analysis,” only a small     GLN: hydrochloride (HCl), sulfate, and  N‐acetyl‐d‐
  VetBooks.ir  In fact, truth‐in‐labeling problems have been docu-  ferences among the available GLN forms. For instance,
                                                               glucosamine.  Several  reports  have  demonstrated  dif-
            number have consistently met the label claims.
                                                   1, 86,87,118,144
                                                               in vitro studies have demonstrated that GLN HCl and
            mented, in which ingredients listed on the package were
            not present at the claimed concentration or purity. The   GLN sulfate appear to inhibit cartilage degeneration
            products that have the most inconsistency in concen-  more consistently than N‐acteyl‐d‐glucosamine. 45,46,129
            trations compared with the label claims tend to be   The GLN sulfate form has been postulated to be more
            those that state that they are a “complex,” “formula,”   efficacious because serum and/or synovial fluid con-
            or “blend” of ingredients with no weight of each com-  centrations of sulfate increase after GLN sulfate
            ponent listed.  In general, products should be avoided   administration. 59,65,102,130
                        144
            if they do not have information on the quality, make   Oral bioavailability of GLN HCl in the horse has been
            exaggerated claims, or rely on testimonials.  The pres-  reported to range from 2.5% to 6.1%, which has been
                                                 142
            ence of lot numbers and expiration dates generally   attributed to a large volume of distribution, poor absorp-
            offers some evidence of accuracy in labeling, but does   tion from the GI tract, and extensive tissue uptake. 37,82
            not guarantee it. 12                               Radiolabeling studies have shown that there is good dis-
              Many manufacturers with similar products attempt to   tribution of GLN to articular cartilage with levels exceed-
                                                                                   128
            compete in the market with claims based on research con-  ing those in the plasma.  However, GLN delivery to the
            ducted by another company, even though there is no proof   articular cartilage does not necessarily mean that it
            of comparable efficacy. Efficacy of these products in the   becomes incorporated into articular cartilage. In fact,
            horse is hard to prove, even for those products in which   after oral dosing in the horse, it has been shown that syn-
            research was conducted; a systematic review of five stud-  ovial fluid levels of GLN are less than 10% of those in the
            ies using nutraceuticals for treating OA in horses stated   serum at the same time.  This indicates that GLN does
                                                                                    82
            that the strength of evidence of efficacy to improve pain or   not diffuse readily into the synovial fluid from the plasma,
            gait abnormalities was poor.  Because these products   suggesting that the effects of GLN may lie in its effect on
                                     152
            are oral, it is also important to ensure that there is adequate   nonarticular tissues.  The presence of synovial inflamma-
                                                                                82
            evidence of absorption in the species of interest, or else the   tion induced by LPS in carpal joints led to significantly
            product is essentially useless. 142  As with many medica-  higher synovial GLN concentrations compared with lev-
            tions, each particular individual may respond in an adverse   els attained in healthy joints following oral administra-
            fashion to various ingredients within the product. This   tion of GLN HCl,  as well as the potential to mitigate
                                                                               103
            could be a reaction to the main ingredients, contaminants,   production of inflammatory mediators and elicit repara-
            or inert ingredients that are added to help disperse or   tive processes to articular cartilage. 83
            dilute the product.  Unfortunately, to date, little to no   Exogenous GLN has been shown in vitro to have no
                            12
            information exists about these products, which is impor-  detrimental effects on normal articular cartilage
            tant to consider when discussing safety of the product   explants   or  on  chondrocyte  metabolism  after  long‐
                                                                       32
            with a horse owner or trainer. Most of the information is   term exposure.  Many in vitro studies have generally
                                                                             67
            anecdotal and is based on the lack of any major adverse   found that GLN induces the production of new cartilage
            reactions after treatment. 142                     while protecting cartilage that is already present. 6,32–34,71
              One should not, and cannot, assume that these prod-  GLN stimulates synthesis of proteoglycans (PG) and
            ucts will not cause harm. Just because there is a lack of   collagen while inhibiting PG degradation.  This may
            published adverse reactions to a nutraceutical does not   occur partly via downregulation of matrix metallopro-
            mean that one should extrapolate that the product is   teinases (MMP) and aggrecanases. 110,128  The anti‐inflam-
            safe.  In  fact,  most  manufacturers  will  not  spend  the   matory effects are likely prostaglandin‐independent and
            money to prove safety, so the lack of side effects does   may be due to enhanced production of HA by synovio-
            not mean that a product is safe.  Unfortunately, even   cytes. 44,66,82,115,131  In addition, GLN may protect against
                                        142
            when safety data is present on a particular product, the   some of the negative effects of steroids on cartilage, as
            variability in concentrations of the ingredients within   demonstrated in an in vitro equine chondrocyte pellet
            and between batches can make this data inaccurate. It is   model in which GLN had a protective effect against
            also worth noting that these products have only been   the  inhibition of proteoglycan production caused by
            around for a few decades, so there is limited data regard-  methylprednisolone. 14
            ing the effects of long‐term administration.          Few equine in vivo studies have used only GLN. Oral
              The remainder of this section discusses the known sci-  administration  of GLN in young  horses in training
            entific effects of the most common compounds contained   showed no significant treatment  effect  on serum bio-
            in equine nutraceuticals that are currently available.  marker concentrations of bone and cartilage metabo-
                                                               lism. 17,44  High levels of GLN used for in vitro experiments
            Glucosamine                                        that were effective have never been achieved in experi-
                                                               mental  models  in  humans  and  animals.   Therefore,
                                                                                                    153
              Glucosamine (GLN) is an aminosaccharide essential   extrapolating the results from in vitro studies to the in
            for normal growth and repair of articular cartilage. 115,139    vivo setting must be done with caution. The most con-
            GLN compounds have been used as nutraceuticals in   sistent information that can be extrapolated from
            horses due to their possible role in stimulating chondro-  human studies is that it appears to take 4–8 weeks
            cyte metabolism and reducing inflammation in the   before GLN begins to act and that GLN would likely
            articular cartilage.                               give the best results when used preventatively – when
              Exogenous GLN can be produced synthetically or   minor lesions are present prior to the advancement of
            derived from marine exoskeletons or beef carcasses.   the disease process. 108
   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   941   942   943