Page 238 - Avian Virology: Current Research and Future Trends
P. 238

Avian Leukosis Virus



          Yongxiu Yao and Venugopal Nair*                                                                   8




          Viral Oncogenesis Group, Pirbright Institute, Surrey, UK.

          *Correspondence: venugopal.nair@pirbright.ac.uk
          https://doi.org/10.21775/9781912530106.08






          Abstract                                              the erythropoietic  (red cell)  system, and  the myelopoietic
          The leukosis/sarcoma (L/S) group of diseases comprise of a   (myelocytic) system. Presenting signs of the leukosis are mostly
          variety of transmissible benign and malignant neoplasms, such as   non-specific (loss of appetite, weakness, emaciation, diarrhoea,
          lymphoid, myeloid and erythroid leukosis, caused by avian leuko-  pale wattles). Lymphoid leukosis has been the most common
          sis viruses (ALV), belonging to the family Retroviridae. Extensive   form of L/S group of diseases seen in field flocks, although more
          research in the last several decades have uncovered interesting   recently, myeloid leukosis had become more prevalent.
          biology of these viruses and their pathogenic mechanisms. ALV   Infection of chickens with ALV is the most common L/S
          are characterized by the unique possession of a reverse tran-  virus infection encountered in field flocks and is known to be of
          scriptase enzyme that drives the generation of the DNA provirus,   significant  economic  importance.  Economic  losses  from  ALV-
          which is integrated into the host genome during viral replication,   induced diseases are attributed to two sources. First, the tumour
          and induction of diseases is from insertional activation as well as   mortality that usually accounts for 1–2%, with occasional losses
          transduction of oncogenes such as c-myc. ALV-associated dis-  as high as 20% in some flocks. Second, subclinical infection by
          eases are widespread with significant economic losses resulting   ALV, to which most flocks are subject, produces a depressive
          from tumours and subclinical infections and loss of productivity.   effect on a number of important performance traits, including egg
          ALVs infecting chickens belong to six envelope subgroups A, B, C,   production and quality (Gavora et al., 1980, 1982; Gavora, 1987).
          D, E (endogenous retroviruses) and J, with A, B and J subgroups   Economic losses due to ALV tumour mortality and reduced pro-
          the most important ones in terms of distribution and induction of   ductivity were estimated to be in millions of US dollars each year
          diseases. While A and B subgroups are primarily associated with   (Nair and Fadly, 2013). Currently the virus is causing huge eco-
          lymphoid leukosis, ALV-J primarily induces myeloid leukosis,   nomic losses to the poultry industry in countries such as China
          currently a major problem in countries such as China. With the   (Gao et al., 2010, 2016; Payne and Nair, 2012).
          virus transmitted both vertically through the eggs from infected   The earliest reports of leukotic diseases in fowl are those of
          hens and horizontally, prevention of the disease is mainly by   Roloff (1868), who described a case of ‘lymphosarcomatosis’ in
          preventing the introduction of viruses and by eradication, taking   1868, and of Caparini (1896), who in 1896 described cases of
          advantage of the diagnostic tests to identify and disrupt the infec-  ‘fowl leukaemia’. In 1905, Butterfield diagnosed ‘aleukemic lym-
          tion  cycle.  Genetic resistance to  ALV  infection  has  also been   phadenosis’ in the USA (Butterfield, 1905). In 1908, Ellermann
          observed primarily based on the presence or absence of specific   and Bang, working in Copenhagen, founded the discipline of viral
          receptor  sequences. Recent  advances in  genome editing  offers   oncology when they transmitted erythroleukemia and myelog-
          the possibility of exploiting genetic resistance in the fight against   enous leukaemia by inoculation of chickens with cell-free filtrates
          ALV.                                                  (Ellermann and Bang, 1908).
                                                                  Ellermann (1921) also provided further classification of the
                                                                pathological forms of avian leukosis that essentially still holds
          Introduction and history                              today. He described in his monograph ‘The Leucosis of Fowls
          The leukosis/sarcoma (L/S) group of diseases comprise a variety   and Leucemia Problems’ (Ellermann, 1921) (1) ‘lymphatic
          of transmissible benign and malignant neoplasms of chickens   leucosis’ with lymphoblastic hyperplasia; (2) ‘myeloic leucosis’
          caused by members of the family Retroviridae (Fauquet, 2005).   with leukaemia and general hyperplasia of ‘myeloic’ cells (mye-
          The term ‘leukosis’ embraces several different leukaemia-like pro-  locytes, ‘large mononuclear cells’ and ‘poikilonuclear cells’); and
          liferative diseases of the different cell types of the hemopoietic   (3) ‘intravascular lymphoid leucosis’ involving ‘lymphoidocytes’
          system caused by avian leukosis virus (ALV); the term leukosis   which he concluded were erythrocytic cells and that this intravas-
          is used because a leukaemic blood picture is not always present.   cular form was erythroleukosis.
          The components of the hemopoietic system that undergo neo-  Also, in the early decades of  the twentieth century, Peyton
          plastic change include the lymphopoietic (lymphocytic) system,   Rous,  working  in  New  York,  was  undertaking  studies  on  the
   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243