Page 242 - Avian Virology: Current Research and Future Trends
P. 242

Avian Leukosis Virus |   235

          Exogenous and endogenous avian leukosis               EV21 ALV by the ev21 locus, which is linked with the sex-linked
          viruses                                               slow-feathering gene K, on the Z chromosome, has a tolerizing
          On the basis of the way in which they are transmitted naturally,   effect on response to exogenous ALV, and has been associated
          ALV can also be classified as exogenous or endogenous viruses   with an increased incidence of lymphoid leukosis in the field and
          (reviewed by Crittenden, 1981; Payne, 1987). The former spread   experimentally.
          as infectious virions, either vertically (congenitally) from dam
          to progeny through the egg, or horizontally from bird to bird.
          Viruses of subgroups A, B, C, D and J spread in this way, and of   Transmission and epizootiology
          these A, B and J occur commonly in the field; C and D appear   Exogenous ALVs are almost ubiquitous in commercial chickens
          to be rare. Endogenous viruses are integrated into the genome of   on a world-wide basis, although many primary egg-type and
          normal birds as proviral sequences that are transmitted geneti-  meat-type breeding companies have successfully instituted ALV
          cally as Mendelian genes, either as complete viral genomes able   eradication schemes. Chickens are the natural hosts for all viruses
          to code for infectious virus of subgroup E, or more usually, as   of L/S group (Payne, 1987); these viruses have not been isolated
          incomplete (defective) genomes able to code for certain retro-  from other avian species except pheasants, partridges, and quail.
          viral products (e.g. gs-antigen) only. The sites of integration of   Exogenous ALVs are transmitted in two ways: vertically from
          these endogenous viruses are termed ‘ev loci’. Endogenous ALVs   infected hens to their offspring through the egg and horizontally
          are apparently non-oncogenic although they may influence the   from bird to bird by direct or indirect contact (Payne, 1992;
          response of the bird to infection by exogenous ALVs by inducing   Payne and Nair, 2012). Although usually only a small percent-
          immunological tolerance or immunity. Apart from the family of   age of chicks are infected vertically, this route of transmission is
          ev endogenous viruses closely related to exogenous ALV, other   important in transmitting the infection from one generation to
          more distantly related endogenous families have been discovered   the next, and in providing a source of contact infection to other
          in the normal genome, namely: EAV (endogenous avian virus),   chicks. Most chickens become infected by close contact with
          ART-CH (avian retrotransposon from chicken genome) and CR1   congenitally infected birds. Sources of virus from infected birds
          (chicken repeat 1). The EAV family is of particular interest, since   include faeces, saliva and desquamated skin. The period of sur-
          members designed EAV-HP (or ev/J) appear to be the source of   vival of ALV outside the body is relatively short (a few hours),
          the envelope gene of subgroup J ALV (Sacco et al., 2000).  and consequently ALV is not highly contagious. Although verti-
            The origin, evolutionary relationships and biological sig-  cal transmission is important in the maintenance of the infection,
          nificance of these elements are not clearly understood. In   horizontal infection may also be necessary to maintain a rate
          evolutionary  terms,  the  CR1  retrotransposon  elements  appear   of vertical transmission sufficient to prevent the infection from
          to be the most ancient and the ev genes the most recent. These   dying out (Payne and Bumstead, 1982). The infection does not
          types of elements are examples of retroelements (retroposons,   spread readily from between birds through indirect contact (in
          retrotransposons) that are found in an extremely broad range of   separate pens or cages), probably because of the relatively short
          organisms, including fungi, plants,  protozoa, and animals, and   life of the virus outside the birds. However, contact exposure at
          that are concerned with the mobility of genes within the genome   hatch was shown to be an effective method of spread of ALV-J
          of organisms. These elements are believed to be the evolution-  among broiler breeder chickens (Fadly and Smith, 1999; Witter,
          ary precursors of retroviruses; that is, genetic elements that have   2000; Witter et al., 2000) and was prevented by small group rear-
          acquired the ability to exist as infectious entities outside of cells.   ing (Witter and Fadly, 2001).
          Even so, it is considered that some endogenous viruses, such as
          the ev loci, may represent exogenous viruses that have become
          reintegrated on an evolutionary scale into the germline. Most   Flock infection
          endogenous viruses are genetically defective in that they do not   Four classes of ALV infection statuses are recognized in mature
          possess the full complement of retroviral genes necessary for the   chicken flocks: (1) no viraemia, no antibody (V-A-); (2) no virae-
          production of infectious virions. However, some do and they   mia, with antibody (V-A+); (3) with viraemia, with antibody
          give rise to subgroup E ALV, of which RAV-0 is the prototype.   (V+A+); and (4) with viraemia, no antibody (V+A-) reviewed
          Unlike viruses of the other subgroups, subgroup E ALV do not   by (Payne, 1992; Payne and Nair, 2012; Nair and Fadly, 2013).
          induce neoplasms, evidently because the LTR has weak gene   Birds in an infection-free flock and genetically resistant birds
          promoter  activity. The  biological  value of endogenous  viruses   in a susceptible flock fall into the category V-A-. Genetically
          is not clear. It has been argued that because they persist, they   susceptible birds in an infected flock fall into one of the other
          must be of value. More specifically, the presence of ev2 or ev3 has   three categories. Most are V-A+, and a minority, usually less than
          been reported to protect birds from a non-neoplastic syndrome   10%, is V+A–. Most V+A– hens transmit ALV to a varying but
          caused by infection with subgroup A ALV (Crittenden et al.,   relatively high proportion of their progeny (Payne, 1992; Payne
          1982, 1984). However, in certain circumstances they can be det-  and Nair, 2012). A small proportion of V-A+ hens transmit the
          rimental. Thus, embryonic infection with RAV-0 causes a more   virus congenitally and do so more intermittently; the tendency
          persistent viraemia and more neoplasms following infection   for congenital transmission of ALV in this category was found to
          with exogenous ALV, apparently due to depression of humoral   be more frequent in hens with low antibody titre (Tsukamoto et
          immunity (Crittenden et al., 1987). Similarly, expression of   al., 1992). Congenitally infected embryos develop immunologic
   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247