Page 244 - Avian Virology: Current Research and Future Trends
P. 244

Avian Leukosis Virus |   237

          generally are considered to have little direct influence on tumour   (DCs) during the early stages of differentiation and can trigger
          growth. After inoculation of birds with ALV at 4 weeks of age or   apoptosis (Liu, D. et al., 2016a). ALV-J inhibits the differentia-
          older, transient viraemia was detectable at 1 week and was fol-  tion and maturation of DCs and alters cytokine expression that
          lowed by antibodies at 3 weeks and later (Maas et al., 1982). In a   includes IL-1β, IL-8, and IFN-γ (D. Liu et al., 2016b). Chicken
          study of birds naturally infected after hatching, antibodies were   macrophages are susceptible to ALV-J, and IL-1β, IL-6, ISG12-1,
          first detected at 9 weeks of age, with a marked increase in the   and Mx were altered (Lai et al., 2011; Feng et al., 2017).
          proportion with antibodies between 14 and 18 weeks, when 80%   Congenitally infected chickens do not develop immune
          were positive (Rubin et al., 1962). Antibodies against gs-antigen   responses  to the  virus. Instead, they become immunologically
          may also occur in ALV-infected birds, but these apparently have no   tolerant to the virus and develop a persistent viraemia in the
          influence on tumour growth (Roth et al., 1971; Sigel et al., 1971).  absence of neutralizing antibodies (Rubin et al., 1962; Meyers,
            Knowledge of the occurrence of, and the part played by, cell-  1976). Early infection with ALV-J is particularly likely to induce a
          mediated immunity in ALSV infections is still incomplete, but it   tolerant infection (Fadly and Smith, 1999; Witter, 2000; Witter et
          is likely to be directed against both the virus infection and tumour   al., 2000). Birds with a tolerant viraemic infection are more likely
          formation. The presence of cytotoxic lymphocytes against viral   to develop neoplasms than are immune-infected birds, because of
          envelope antigens has been shown in birds immunized with   the greater virus load in the viraemic birds.
          ALV or RSV (Kurth and Bauer, 1972; Bauer et al., 1976; Bauer   Infection  by  ALV  can  depress  primary  and  secondary  anti-
          and Fleischer, 1981), and cell-mediated immunity and the   body responses and cell-mediated immunity (Rup et al., 1982)
          MHC complex are clearly implicated in the regression of Rous   to unrelated antigens, although these effects have been variable
          sarcomas (Schat, 1987, 1996). Viral proteins expressed on the   in different studies. In congenital infection with the A subgroup
          surface of tumour cells appear to be important targets for the cell-  RAV-1, B- and T-cell function during the early and late stages of
          mediated immunity, and non-virion transformation-specific cell   infection were undetectable, although no histological damage to
          surface antigens may also be implicated. Thacker and co-workers   the bursa, thymus, or spleen was observed (Fadly et al., 1982).
          (Thacker et al., 1995) have reported on a new system for study-  In contrast, subgroup B ALVs have been reported to induce a
          ing MHC-restricted cytotoxic lymphocyte responses to ALV   marked suppression of the humoral immune response to several
          infection, which should be of value in determining the role of this   antigens and decreased responsiveness to several mitogens (Watts
          type of cell-mediated immunity in ALV infections. Whether cell-  and Smith, 1980). Evidence that subgroup J ALV is immunosup-
          mediated immune responses are directed against tumour cells in   pressive appears to be equivocal (Stedman et  al., 2001, 2000;
          lymphoid and other forms of leukosis has yet to be determined.  Landman et al., 2002; Zavala et al., 2002). ALV-J infection
            Despite major gaps in our understanding of innate immunity   induced a strong immune response at 2 weeks of age, but after 4
          and adaptive immunity against ALVs for a long time, signifi-  weeks of age, the response decreased quickly suggesting that 3–4
          cant additional information on the immune responses to ALV   weeks post infection is the critical time at which the ALV-J virus
          have been gathered from the studies on ALV-J infections. ALV   exerts its immunosuppressive effects on the host (Wang, F. et al.,
          infection in chickens may be recognized by Toll-like receptor   2011). Nucleotide sequence analysis of consecutive isolates from
          7 (TLR-7) and melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5   V+A+ infection profile suggested viral evolution to escape the
          (MDA5) (Hang et al., 2014; Li et al., 2015; Feng et al., 2016),   host immune response thereby contributing to ALV J persistence
          followed by induction of innate immunity including differential   (Pandiri et al., 2010). Serum antibodies, which are mainly in the
          expression of cytokine and interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs)   IgG fraction (Meyers and Dougherty, 1972), are passed on by
          (Sabat et al., 2010; Gao et al., 2015; Li et al., 2015; Dai et al.,   the hen to her progeny via the egg yolk that provides a passive
          2016; Feng et al., 2016). It was demonstrated that the increased   immunity that lasts 3–4 weeks. Passive antibody delays infection
          interleukin-6 (IL-6) is induced by the ALV-J envelope protein   by ALV (Witter et al., 1966), reduces the incidence of viraemia
          gp85 and capsid protein p27 via PI3K- and NF-κB-mediated sig-  and shedding of ALV (Fadly, 1988) and reduces the incidence of
          nalling (Gao et al., 2016). The expression of caspase-1 combined   tumours (Burmester, 1955). Level and persistence of antibody in
          with the inflammasome adaptor NOD-like receptor family, pyrin   the chick is related to the titre of antibody in the dam’s serum.
          domain-containing 3 (NLRP3), and proinflammatory cytokines
          IL-1β  and  IL-18  increased  in  ALV-J-infected  chick  livers  (Liu,
                                                           +
          X.L. et al., 2016). At 3–4 weeks post infection by ALV-J, CD4    Diagnosis
                                      +
          T-cell numbers decreased and CD8  T-cell numbers increased
          in the infected chicken spleen (F. Wang et al., 2011) indicating   Conventional techniques
                                                           +
                 +
          that CD4  T-cells may be a primary target for ALV-J with CD8
          T-cells playing an important role in host immunity. ALV-A/B/J   Virological tests
          infection can increase chicken interferon regulatory factors 3   Because  different  ALV  subgroups,  including  the  endogenous
          (IRF3) promoter activity in DF-1 cells. DF-1 cells pre-treated   retrovirus subgroup E, are widespread among chickens, demon-
          with recombinant chicken IFN-α can inhibit the replication of   stration of antigen or antibody have limited value in diagnosing
          ALV-A/B/J (Dai et al., 2016). It was also found that miR-23b pro-  field cases of lymphomas. However, assays for the detection of
          motes ALV-J replication by targeting interferon regulatory factor   ALV  are very  useful  in identification and  classification of  new
          1 (IRF1) (Li et al., 2015). ALV-J can infect chicken dendritic cells   isolates, safety testing of vaccines, and in testing pathogen-free
   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249