Page 246 - Avian Virology: Current Research and Future Trends
P. 246

Avian Leukosis Virus |   239

             RSV pseudotypes. Usually, a 1:5 dilution of heat-inactivated   This novel method allows for three very common subgroups of
             (56°C for 30 minutes) serum is mixed with an equal quantity   exogenous ALVs (ALV-A, ALV-B, and ALV-J) to be detected and
             of a standard preparation of RSV of a known pseudotype.   differentiated in one reaction. Real-time RT-PCR using the H5/
             After incubation, the residual virus is quantitated by any one   H7 primer pair has been shown to be highly reproducible (Kim et
             of many procedures, the cell culture assay being most com-  al., 2002; Qin et al., 2013). TaqMan-based real-time PCR method
             monly used. A microneutralization test to assay for residual   for the rapid detection and quantification of ALV-J with proviral
             virus can be used for detection of ALV antibody (Fadly and   DNA (Qin et al., 2013) as well as ALV-A and ALV-B (duplex
             Witter, 1998). The test can be conducted in 96-well plates,   real-time RT-PCR) (Zhou et al., 2011) have also been reported.
             and the neutralization of the virus is determined by ELISA   Dai et al. (2015) showed that the SYBR Green I-based real-time
             on culture fluids (Fadly et al., 1989). Positive ELISA indicates   RT-PCR assay provides a powerful tool for the detection of ALV
             no antibody, whereas a negative ELISA indicates neutraliza-  and study of virus replication and infection. In a recent report, Xie
             tion of ALV and the presence of antibody. Although virus   and colleague used a proximity ligation technique and combined
             and antibody within subgroups usually cross-neutralize,   PCR with the immunoassay to develop a novel immuno-PCR
             antibodies against variant viruses may fail to neutralize   (Im-PCR) approach for the detection of ALV (Xie et al., 2016).
             a representative subgroup virus. This has been observed   As further modification of PCR tests, loop-mediated isother-
             particularly with subgroup J, due to virus mutation, and is a   mal amplification (LAMP) method for ALV subgroup A and J
             limitation to the use of VN tests. These tests are slow requir-  has been developed (Zhang et al., 2010; Wang, Y. et al., 2011).
             ing seven to ten days and are technically demanding.  The LAMP method was developed by Notomi et al. (2000).
          2   Antibody ELISA tests. Viral antigens may be used in ELISA   This novel technique generally requires isothermal conditions
             tests to detect subgroup-specific ALV antibodies. Tests for   and four different primers for DNA amplification (Notomi et al.,
             antibodies to subgroups A, B and J are commercially avail-  2000; Mori et al., 2001) and has been applied to the detection
             able. The subgroup J antibody ELISA use recombinant env   of several pathogens. The LAMP reaction requires 30 to 60 min
             antigen produced in baculovirus system (Venugopal et al.,   and can be performed at a single temperature ranging from 60 to
             1997) and appear to detect antibodies to all variant viruses   65°C. LAMP does not require the DNA denaturation, annealing,
             studied. The antibody ELISA tests are rapid (requiring one   and extension PCR cycles (Notomi et al., 2000; Mori et al., 2001).
             day), specific, and suitable for large scale testing.  In addition, the results can be ascertained easily by the naked eye
                                                                (Mori et al., 2001; Bista et al., 2007).
          Molecular techniques
          A more effective control of ALV infections mainly depends on the
          early detection and removal of infected birds to reduce contact   Intervention strategies
          with non-infected birds and the incidence of horizontal spread.
          Therefore, achieving rapid detection of infection is imperative in   Vaccination
          effective control of the spread of ALVs. Polymerase Chain Reac-  Vaccination strategy is not preferred for the control of ALV infec-
          tion (PCR) based methods had been developed to provide a rapid   tions, as eradication  of  the  virus  from  the  flocks  is preferred.
          tool for detection and identification of ALVs proviral DNA and   However, the idea of using vaccines to increase host resistance
          viral RNA including subgroup E viruses. Reverse transcription   to ALV infection has been proposed (Salter et al., 1991). In a
          PCR (RT-PCR) has also been used to detect several subgroups   series of attempts to inactivate ALV by various means, however,
          of ALV (Häuptli et al., 1997; Zhou et al., 2011). A specific PCR   Burmester (1968) demonstrated that ability of these virus
          for ALV subgroup A can be used to detect proviral DNA and viral   preparations to induce antibody was destroyed almost concur-
          RNA in various tissues from ALV-infected chickens (van Woen-  rently with inactivation (unpublished data). Attempts to produce
          sel et al., 1992). Reverse transcriptase nested PCR (RT-nested   attenuated strains of ALV that do not induce disease have also
          PCR) test that amplifies a fragment of the LTR of exogenous   failed (Okazaki et al., 1982). Results of experimental vaccina-
          ALV subgroups A, B, C, D and J, but not endogenous retroviral   tion with live ALV on shedding and congenital transmission
          sequences, has been described (García et al., 2003). Several   of the virus are equivocal. Some success has been obtained in
          primers specific for the detection of the most commonly isolated   attempts to increase the resistance of the host to RSV by immu-
          ALVs, particularly subgroup A (Lupiani et al., 2000), and the new   nization with viral or cellular antigens (Payne, 1981; Bennett and
          subgroup ALV-J (Smith, E.J. et al., 1998; Smith, L.M. et al., 1998;   Wright, 1987). The use of experimental recombinant ALSVs as
          Silva et al., 2000) have been developed. Other primers specific   vaccines may prove to be a valuable adjunct to current programs
          for endogenous, subgroup E ALV can also be used to detect cell   for reduction or eradication of ALV infection. Recombinant
          culture infected with endogenous ALV-E, but not those infected   ALV-J gp85 protein vaccine with either a liposomal, a cytosine-
          with exogenous ALV of subgroups A, B, C, D, and J (Fadly and   phosphate-guanine oligodeoxynucleotide (CpG-ODN) or silica
          Witter, 1998). Multiplex PCR is a useful technique for the rapid   nanoparticles adjuvant provided partial protection and elicited
          differential diagnosis of avian viruses and the detection of multi-  high antibody titres (Dou et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2014; Zhang
          ple infections of avian viruses under field conditions. Recently a   et al., 2015; Cheng et al., 2017). Immune enhancer Taishan Pinus
          sensitive and specific multiplex PCR method for the detection of   massoniana pollen polysaccharide (TPPPS) reportedly can
          ALV-A, ALV-B, and ALV-J has been developed (Gao et al., 2014).   enhance the immunogenicity of gp85 recombinant proteins and
   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251