Page 141 - Canine Lameness
P. 141

9.3  ­Groos,  BrocheBocas, cand CyraroBo  EceBacyBra  113

             9.3   Gross, Biochemical, and Cytologic Examination

             Joint fluid analysis and evaluation typically involve assessment of gross appearance, protein con-
             centration, total nucleated cell count (TNCC), and cytologic interpretation. Other biochemical
             parameters, such as glucose and lactate, can also be measured but the availability of these tests
             may vary from laboratory to laboratory. A summary of typical findings in non‐affected canine
             joints and general interpretation guidelines are provided in Figure 9.2 and Table 9.1.


             9.3.1  Gross Appearance
             Gross appearance of synovial fluid assesses turbidity, color (particularly regarding the presence of
             blood), viscosity, and the amount of volume sampled from each joint. In healthy patients, joint
             fluid is typically clear and pale yellow, as well as thick and viscous. While these characteristics will
             be determined by the laboratory, it is also helpful to note such qualities at the time of sample col-
             lection. Viscosity can be evaluated empirically by forming a string of synovial fluid between the
             tips of the fingers, but this is only recommended to be performed in cases with ample amount of
             sample.  A  fingertip  stretch  distance  of  ~2–3 cm  is  generally  considered  appropriate  viscosity.
             Recording the presence or absence of blood is particularly helpful to the clinical pathologist for
             distinguishing blood contamination due to sample collection from overt hemorrhage.


             9.3.2  Protein Concentration
             While protein concentrations are typically estimated using a refractometer, automated chemistry
             measurements and electrophoresis have also been used to determine and/or characterize such.
             However, some laboratories will not perform automated protein concentration analyses on joint
             fluids if the fluid is too viscous. When using a refractometer, it is important to note that the pres-
             ence of other solutes in the fluid may affect the measurement of protein concentration, as does
             underfilling  EDTA  tubes  or  aspirating  joints  previously  treated  with  intra‐articular  injections.
             Therefore, it is critical to use appropriately sized EDTA tubes due to the possibility of erroneous
             results secondary to EDTA dilution when tubes are underfilled. Alternatively, if sufficient sample
             is available, red top tubes can be used to measure protein concentrations.
               Normal protein levels in synovial fluid are between 1.5 and 3.0 g/dl (MacWilliams and Friedrichs
             2003). In disease states or when there is inadvertent sampling of blood, protein concentrations can
             begin to rise and approach levels similar to serum or plasma.


             9.3.3  Total Nucleated Cell Counts
             TNCCs are typically performed by an automated analyzer, most often on samples collected into
             EDTA. TNCCs within synovial fluid are predominately composed of white blood cells. However,
             other nucleated cells may also be included in the analyzer count as part of the TNCC (e.g. synovio-
             cytes, nucleated red blood cells, neoplastic cells, etc.) making cytological analysis in addition to the
             TNCC imperative. If an analyzer is not available, or the amount of synovial fluid retrieved is insuf-
             ficient to process through an analyzer, hemocytometers or direct smears can be used to assess cel-
             lularity.  If  a  direct  smear  is  used  to  estimate  cellularity,  the  average  number  of  cells  per  40×
             objective high‐power field over 10 fields can be multiplied by 1000 to yield an approximate number
             of cells per microliter. However, the evaluator should be aware that visual estimates are less
             accurate than automated methods. The viscosity of joint fluid can make estimation of cellularity
   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146