Page 343 - Canine Lameness
P. 343

19.3  ­FractFres  ofctrf ctofr  ret o  315

             injuries is imperative. The patient will typically exhibit non-weight-bearing lameness, with variable
             amounts of swelling and crepitus around the fractured region. Examination of the area usually shows
             severe  pain  upon  manipulation.  Diagnosis  of  these  fractures  can  generally  be  accomplished  with
             orthogonal radiographs, although the diagnosis can be missed if only a single view is taken (Figure 19.4).
               CT may be beneficial for complex fractures, to identify intra-articular components, bone fissures,
             and additional fragments that may be missed with radiographs.

             19.3.1  Patellar Fractures

             Traumatic patellar fractures are rarely encountered in dogs. They are the result of severe, direct
             trauma to the patella and can be diagnosed with standard radiography (Figure 19.3). Because of
             the extreme tension by the quadriceps muscle, treatment is challenging. Surgical fixation and par-
             tial patellectomy are potential treatment options. These fractures may also be associated with dis-
             ruption  of  the  patellar  ligament  and  other  soft  tissue  pathologies  (e.g.  cruciate  and  collateral
             ligaments, and menisci), which need to be carefully investigated (either at the time of surgery or



              (A)                (C)                (E)                 (G)                     STIFLE REGION
















              (B)                (D)                (F)                 (H)
















             Figure 19.4  Examples of physeal fractures in four patients. Patient I (A) severely displaced avulsion
             fracture of the tibial tuberosity apophysis without disruption of the proximal tibial epiphysis. These
             fractures generally require surgical reconstruction. Patient II (B) minimally displaced tibial tuberosity
             avulsion fracture (MDTTAF). These patients are generally treated nonsurgically. Patient III (C–F) mildly
             displaced fracture (C, D) of the proximal tibial apophysis and epiphysis. The small fragment (white arrow
             image (C)) indicates that this is a Type II SH fracture. Note that the fracture is difficult to identify on the
             craniocaudal view. The only abnormality is a (white arrow) slight widening of the lateral aspect of the
             proximal tibial physis. Images (E, F) are of the normal leg and provided for comparison. Patient IV (G, H)
             mildly displaced SH Type I fracture. Note the subtle (white arrows) widening of the medial and caudal
             aspect of the proximal tibial physis.
   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348