Page 79 - Small Animal Clinical Nutrition 5th Edition
P. 79

Macronutrients         79


                  Apparent and true digestibility of fats, starch and energy are  Table 5-8. Mineral availability as affected by different fiber
                                                                       sources fed at 5% total dietary fiber.*
        VetBooks.ir  al, 1996; Muir et al, 1996).                      Fiber          (%)**  Calcium  (%)***  Phosphorus
                  unaffected by the type and amount of fiber in foods (Silvio et
                                                                                      Zinc
                                                                                                      Iron
                                                                                                                 †
                                                                                              (%)**
                    Apparent digestibility of protein is lower in foods contain-
                                                                       source
                                                                                                               (%)
                  ing fiber because of increased nitrogen in feces from the  Apple pectin  ND  ND     55 a      75
                                                                       Beet pulp       24 a   44 a    29 a     67 a
                  increased fecal biomass. Research using ileal-cannulated dogs  Cellulose  88  100   100      100
                  has shown that true digestibility of protein is unaffected by  Citrus pulp cells  ND  ND  49 a  75
                  dietary fiber type or content (Silvio et al, 1996; Muir et al,  Corn bran  94  92   100      ND
                                                                       Guar gum        ND     ND      100      35 a
                  1996). However, a study that evaluated varying levels of cellu-  Gum arabic  ND  ND  81      100
                  lose and pectin at 10% total dietary fiber (100% cellulose, 66%  Pea fiber  41 a  58 a  ND   ND a
                  cellulose/34% pectin, 66% pectin/34% cellulose and 100%  Peanut hulls  30   100     67       58
                                                                       Soy cotyledon fiber  ND  ND    86       66 a
                  pectin) showed that total crude protein digestibility decreased  Soy hulls  78  100  ND      64 a
                  with increasing pectin levels (Silvio et al, 2000).The discrep-  Sunflower hulls  54  100  100 a  ND
                  ancy between the results obtained with total tract apparent  Wheat middlings  70  100  51    ND
                                                                       Key: ND = not determined.
                  digestibility and true digestibility can be explained by taking  *Availability (%) of the mineral in a food with 5% iso-total dietary
                  into account fermentation in the colon. One of the assump-  fiber relative to the same food with no fiber.
                  tions when calculating digestibility across the entire GI tract is  **Adapted from Wedekind K, Walker L, Hancock J, et al.
                                                                         Bioavailability of zinc and calcium is affected by certain fiber
                  that all fecal material is of dietary origin. Fermentation of  sources. Federation of American Societies for Experimental
                  nutrients that pass into the large intestine, however, results in  Biology Journal 1995; 9: A450.
                  significant amounts of bacterial protein in the feces. Bacterial  ***Adapted from Wedekind K, Walker L, Beyer S, et al.
                                                                         Bioavailability of iron is affected by certain fiber sources in
                  protein is then confounded with undigested dietary protein  chicks and puppies. Ninth International Symposium on Trace
                  resulting in lower apparent digestibility. Therefore, it is best to  Elements in Man and Animals (TEMA-9) 1996; A20.
                                                                       † Adapted from Wedekind K, Beyer S, Titgemeyer E. Bioavailability
                  use true protein digestibility to obtain an unbiased evaluation
                                                                        of phosphorus is affected by certain fiber sources. Federation of
                  of pet foods containing fiber. When evaluating protein  American Societies for Experimental Biology Journal 1996; 10:
                  digestibility data, it is essential that the fiber content of the  A524.
                                                                       a Within the same mineral, a superscript “a” indicates significant
                  food be known, and care must be taken when interpreting and
                                                                        reductions (p <0.10) relative to the no-fiber standard.
                  comparing results among foods.
                    The main excretory product of fiber digestion is additional
                  bacterial protein in the feces. It is typically analyzed as addi-
                  tional fecal nitrogen content and can confound protein  when most of the fiber is slowly fermentable; however, the
                  digestibility measurements made using total fecal collections.  analysis excludes the more rapidly fermentable pectins and
                  Intestinal fermentation of fiber accounts for hydrogen,methane  gums. Because the crude fiber analysis underestimates fer-
                  and other gases in expired breath. Some short-chain fatty acids  mentable fiber, it does not accurately represent the total fiber in
                  are excreted in the stool.                          a pet food.
                    Fiber affects mineral availability (BNF, 1990). Some fiber  Fiber can also be measured by the total dietary fiber method
                  types reduce and others enhance mineral absorption and use  (Prosky et al, 1984) (Figure 5-12). This analysis is used to
                  (Table 5-8). It is not clear what factors in fiber are responsible  determine total fiber and is commonly used for measuring
                  for the effects on mineral availability. Water-holding capacity,  fiber content of human foods. In the total dietary fiber
                  viscosity, cation exchange capacity, particle size, tannin content,  method, lipids are first extracted with ethanol and then the
                  oxalate content and presence of phytates, uronic acid and phe-  sample is digested with  α-amylases to convert readily
                  nolic groups are among the properties of fibers that have been  digestible starches to soluble sugars. All the water-soluble
                  evaluated to predict effects on mineral availability (BNF, 1990;  components (sugars, degraded starch, pectin, gums and most
                  Robinson, 1987; Southgate, 1987). Unfortunately, a direct rela-  of the hemicellulose) are separated from the water-insoluble
                  tionship appears not to exist between these physiochemical  components or insoluble fibers (cellulose, lignin and a small
                  properties measured on fibers in vitro and mineral availability  fraction of hemicelluloses). The water-soluble components are
                  measured in vivo. This disparity reflects the complex nature of  further extracted with ethanol to remove the sugars and
                  the absorption processes within the intestine and interactions  degraded starch. The residue that remains is termed soluble
                  that occur with other food components.              fiber, which includes pectins and gums.
                                                                        The  Van Soest fiber analysis system was developed as an
                  Analyses                                            improvement to the crude fiber method (1963). The Van Soest
                  The fiber content of pet foods or ingredients can be measured  analysis uses detergents to more accurately estimate the differ-
                  by several different laboratory methods; the most common is  ent types of fiber and fractionate them into relatively digestible
                  the crude fiber method (Figure 5-12). In the United States,  and indigestible fractions (Figure 5-12). Neutral detergent fiber
                  regulations require that the maximum amount of crude fiber be  (NDF) is the residue remaining after samples are boiled in a
                  listed on the label of all pet foods (Chapter 9). Determination  solution containing neutral pH detergent and EDTA. The
                  of crude fiber adequately represents total fiber in a pet food  residue that remains is mostly plant cell walls including hemicel-
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84