Page 16 - Signal Summer 2018
P. 16

| SECURITY DEBATE |



       Set up a central intelligence unit which               a bi-annual basis, the threat analysis, while identifying the
       would interact with a future European                  gaps in our ability to respond and specifying the funding
       intelligence unit                                      and resources required to address this.
        Both our Defence Forces and An Garda Síochána have
       separate intelligence units and they have different ways   Develop Ireland’s Defence Industry
       of acting on intelligence information. Therefore, the State   The Defence Forces and Department of Defence,
       has essentially two intelligence gathering agencies, and   through their commitment to continuous training and
       uniquely for a European country, there is no overarch-  education, possess a wealth of innovative personnel who
       ing body above them nor is there a senior government   contribute to the development of ideas, technology and
       security adviser or office mandated with synthesising   processes.
       that intelligence into a comprehensive security analysis.   Within the EU, the role of well-funded research has been
       The investigations of major terrorist attacks in Europe has   identified as one of the drivers of enhanced capability. The
       highlighted the contradiction between the seemingly free   EU is investigating innovative funding mechanisms to sup-
       movement of terrorists across the Union, in stark contrast   port security and defence research in the face of declining
       to the lack of free movement and sharing of intelligence   national defence budgets so as to deliver capability and
       among the various security agencies.                   support industry.
        Our failure to embrace intelligence gathering and shar-  From 2020, it is anticipated that up to €5 billion of EU
       ing is weakening our intelligence capability, as there is no   funds could be devoted to defence spending annually,
       clear line for our EU partners and external agencies to   through a new European Defence Fund.
       interact with one central agency or point of contact.    The myth that a ‘Defence’ industry is incompatible with
        The Department of An Taoiseach, utilising the recently   ‘Neutrality’ is clearly wrong. We should be looking to
       established Government Security Committee, should      maximize Ireland’s benefit from this EU funding.
       immediately develop a  roadmap  for  the  creation  of  a   The Defence Enterprise Initiative as highlighted in the
       security  and  intelligence  unit  which  could  advise  and   White Paper should be developed further, with the estab-
       report to government on and interact actively with other   lishment of a Security and Defence Enterprise Group
       European stakeholders and partners.                    bringing together enterprise, industry, research and prac-
                                                              titioners in the field of security and defence to identify
       Establish a cohesive National Cyber Security           areas of common endeavour and collaboration and the
       Strategy                                               potential of securing EU partners and EU funding to pur-
        Due to the digitalisation of everything from communi-  sue promising projects.
       cation to business  to trade,  cyber-attacks are becom-  Another area that could assist our defence capabilities
       ing more and more common as certain players try to     is through increased participation in European Defence
       take advantage of the technological advances in soci-  Agency (EDA) research programmes. Participation in
       ety. In Ireland, we have seen a number of cyber-attacks   EDA research programmes by Irish researchers has the
       or attempted cyber-attacks this year alone, including   potential to lead to spin-off benefits for the Irish economy
       attempted attacks on the HSE and the ESB. Given the    through the development of non-military applications aris-
       presence of high profile multinational and large tech   ing from the research.
       firms, Ireland could face significant risks into the future.
        According to a 2016 survey, six out of ten Irish firms   Assess the implications of Brexit and plan
       expected to fall victim to a cyber-attack in the year ahead   for Ireland’s post-Brexit security and defence
       and 90% of businesses believe that the government is   policy
       not prepared for a potential cyber-attack against the    The signing of a defence co-operation Memorandum of
       state.We believe as a priority that one of the first joint   Understanding (MoU) between Ireland and the UK in 2015
       approaches in the area of cyber security needs to occur   was an important indication of the growing co-operation
       at an EU level.                                        across a whole range of policies between the two islands.
                                                              This MoU reflects elements of the incremental evolution
       Establish a National Security Council                  of  similar cooperation  between the  Defence Forces,  i.e.
        Relative to our size we have a considerable level of   Finland, Switzerland and European partners in EU security.
       operational expertise, within the emergency/security ser-  We must also plan for a post-Brexit security and
       vices. Yet the operational coordination of these agencies   defence architecture that continues the close coopera-
       as a cohesive entity is still problematic.             tion between Ireland and the UK. This should include an
        Interoperability and coherence is the key to uniting   assessment of the implications of Brexit on the security
       all these elements as an orderly systematic entity. A   situation in Northern Ireland.
       National Security Council (NSC) should be established    The full document was compiled by Deirdre Clune MEP, Sean
       with a statutory responsibility to report and reassess, on   Kelly MEP, Mairead McGuinness MEP and Brian Hayes MEP.



       22 |       | SUMMER ‘18 |
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21