Page 34 - GUAM NOC MADC - 2021 Draft Anti-Doping Rules
P. 34

Substance of Abuse) came from a Contaminated Product, then the period of
                                         Ineligibility shall be, at a minimum, a reprimand and no period of Ineligibility, and
                                         at a maximum, two (2) years  Ineligibility, depending  on the  Athlete  or other
                                         Person’s degree of Fault.
                                                                50

                                         10.6.1.3   Protected Persons or Recreational Athletes

                                         Where the anti-doping rule violation not involving a  Substance of  Abuse  is
                                         committed  by a Protected Person or Recreational Athlete, and the Protected
                                         Person or Recreational Athlete can establish No Significant Fault or Negligence,
                                         then the period of Ineligibility shall be, at a minimum, a reprimand and no period
                                         of Ineligibility, and at a maximum, two (2) years Ineligibility, depending on the
                                         Protected Person or Recreational Athlete’s degree of Fault.

                                10.6.2    Application of  No  Significant Fault  or  Negligence  beyond the  Application of
                                         Article 10.6.1

                                If an Athlete or other Person establishes in an individual case where Article 10.6.1 is not
                                applicable, that he or she bears No Significant Fault or Negligence, then, subject to further
                                reduction or  elimination as provided  in  Article 10.7,  the otherwise applicable  period of
                                Ineligibility may be reduced based on the Athlete or other Person’s degree of Fault, but the
                                reduced period of Ineligibility may not be less than one-half of the period of Ineligibility
                                otherwise applicable. If  the otherwise applicable  period  of  Ineligibility  is a lifetime, the
                                reduced period under this Article may be no less than eight (8) years.
                                                                                              51

                         10.7   Elimination, Reduction, or Suspension of Period of  Ineligibility  or Other
                                Consequences for Reasons Other than Fault

                                                                                                    52
                                10.7.1 Substantial Assistance in Discovering or Establishing Code Violations

                                         10.7.1.1   GMADC may, prior to an appellate decision under Article 13 or the
                                                  expiration of the time to appeal, suspend a part of the Consequences
                                                  (other  than  Disqualification  and  mandatory  Public  Disclosure)
                                                  imposed in an individual case where the Athlete or other Person has
                                                  provided  Substantial Assistance  to an  Anti-Doping  Organization,
                                                  criminal authority or professional disciplinary body which results in: (i)

                  50    [Comment to Article 10.6.1.2: In order to receive the benefit of this Article, the Athlete or other Person must establish not only
                     that the detected Prohibited Substance came from a Contaminated Product, but must also separately establish No Significant
                     Fault or Negligence. It should be further noted that Athletes are on notice that they take nutritional supplements at their own
                     risk. The sanction reduction based on No Significant Fault or Negligence has rarely been applied in Contaminated Product
                     cases unless the Athlete has exercised a high level of caution before taking the Contaminated Product. In assessing whether
                     the  Athlete  can  establish  the  source  of  the  Prohibited Substance,  it  would,  for  example,  be  significant  for  purposes  of
                     establishing whether the Athlete actually Used the Contaminated Product, whether the Athlete had declared the product which
                     was subsequently determined to be contaminated on the Doping Control form.

                     This Article should not be extended beyond products that have gone through some process of manufacturing. Where an
                     Adverse Analytical Finding results from environment contamination of a “non-product” such as tap water or lake water in
                     circumstances where no reasonable person would expect any risk of an anti-doping rule violation, typically there would be No
                     Fault or Negligence under Article 10.5.]

                  51   [Comment to Article 10.6.2: Article 10.6.2 may be applied to any anti-doping rule violation except, those Articles where intent
                     is an element of the anti-doping rule violation (e.g., Article 2.5, 2.7, 2.8,2.9 or 2.11) or an element of a particular sanction (e.g.,
                     Article 10.2.1) or a range of Ineligibility is already provided in an Article based on the Athlete or other Person’s degree of Fault.]

                  52    [Comment to Article 10.7.1: The cooperation of Athletes, Athlete Support Personnel and other Persons who acknowledge their
                     mistakes and are willing to bring other anti-doping rule violations to light is important to clean sport.]

                  2021 GUAM NOC ANTI-DOPING RULES          Page 34 of 70
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39