Page 64 - CHIRP Annual Digest 2017
P. 64

CHIRP Maritime





            Article. 50                                       own ship – if so, what are you doing to prevent it from hap-
                                                              pening in the first place? All of the above examples could
            The Human Element –                               have been prevented if the people on board, backed up by
            still a long way to go                            shore management, had a healthy TEAMWORK ethic which
                                                              encourages people to challenge unsafe procedures where
                                                              appropriate, and which involves proper planning and co-ordi-
            CHIRP has received many reports which may be catego-  nation of onboard activities. Good planning also reduces the
            rised individually as minor near misses. Whilst the report-  danger of people being placed under too much PRESSURE
            ing of these shows that a behavioural-based safety pro-  since tasks are more evenly distributed.
            gramme is in place, it also shows that the Deadly Dozen
            has yet to be embraced (see page 73).             For any “near misses” that you become aware of, try to
                                                              decide which of the twelve aspects of the Deadly Dozen are
            Several of these near miss “one liners” are detailed below.   most appropriate. There may be more than one, in fact there
            They all had remedial action applied, in the form of direct   are often several categories. From a personal perspective,
            intervention.                                     thinking about your surroundings or the tasks that you have
               • A first trip deck hand’s first mooring experience had him   been allocated helps you become more self-aware and able
              actively tending moorings. CAPABILITY. (The inexperienced   to see the dangers before they cause an accident. Why not
              deck hand should have been mentored until he was   discuss the near misses that you experience at your Safety
              deemed experienced enough to actively engage in   Committee meetings and bring in the aspects of the Human
              mooring operations).                            Element? You might be surprised at the results.
               • A bunker tank nearly overflowed when the engineer
              overseeing the operation left to answer an engine room        The above article was published in MFB48
              alarm. DISTRACTIONS. (A dangerous oversight – proper
              planning would have freed up personnel in order to   Article. 51
              prevent this near miss).
              • A lower forepeak space required cleaning – during the  CHIRP Maritime Causal Analysis
              planning the supervisor asked for everything to be made
              ready in half an hour and he would  return at that point.   Introduction
              When he returned personnel were already at work inside the   For every article that CHIRP Maritime publishes in its quar-
              compartment even though they had not received an Entry   terly FEEDBACK magazines, and posts upon the Chirpmari-
              Permit. COMMUNICATIONS. (The supervisor had in fact tested   time.org web site, an analysis of the article is undertaken
              the compartment and had gone off to write up the permit –   in  order  to  identify  the  root  cause(s)  behind  the  incident.
              the crew however misunderstood the correct procedure).  The analysis is based upon James Reason’s research which
               • An oiler taking daily tank soundings walked under a crane   dates back to 1990 and his book Human Error. The underly-
              that was in use for storing operations.  SITUATIONAL   ing principle is described by the Swiss Cheese model which
              AWARENESS and  ALERTING. The oiler could not have   shows clearly the defences which have been missed in order
              been aware of his surroundings or else he would not   for an incident to occur.
              have stepped under a crane with a load. But who had the
              forethought to stop him?                                                         Organisational
              • Sunglasses were used instead of safety goggles during deck                       inuences
              scaling maintenance CULTURE, COMPLACENCY and LOCAL    Missing or
              PRACTICES. If “That’s the way we’ve always done it around   failed defences  Unsafe supervision
              here”, is the philosophy then the culture both on board and
              ashore needs to be modified to change how people think.                              Latent failures
               • A supervisor became involved in a mooring operation. The         Preconditions for
              ship had undertaken several port calls in the previous                unsafe acts
              few days, with associated cargo and administrative                             Latent failures
              operations. Amongst other factors, FATIGUE could have             Unsafe
              been an issue. Tired people make mistakes and the                  acts
              supervisor should have restricted himself to supervision                 Latent failures
              and NOT become involved in the actual work.

            The above reports are encouraging and indicate that people           Active failures
            are thinking about safety, but it is worth remembering that   ACCIDENT!
            the Human Element can involve multiple factors. Take the   Figure 1 – Swiss Cheese Model
            first example of our deck hand getting involved with moor-
            ing - this points to a poor on-board safety culture, a lack of   The latent failures are grouped into eleven categories; these
            standard operational procedures, and a poor company cul-  are Communications, Defences, Design, Error Enforcing Con-
            ture within the Safety Management System. A proper risk   ditions, Hardware, Housekeeping, Incompatible Goals, Main-
            assessment and toolbox talk would have prevented the deck   tenance Management, Organisation, Procedures and Train-
            hand from getting involved.                       ing. James Reason further subdivided these “basic” failures
                                                              based  upon  causal  explanations  for  the  failed  defences.
            Some of the examples may sound very familiar from your   There are many of these for each basic category, and CHIRP



                                                           63
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69