Page 50 - CHIRP annual digest 2016.pdf
P. 50

CHIRP Maritime





             blanks  were  located  at  the  manifold.  The  necessary  CHIRP Comment
             replacement components were fitted in due course.  The risks associated with the walkway design hazards had
                                                               clearly  not  been  reduced  to  ‘As  Low  as  Reasonably
             Lessons to be learnt
                                                               Practical’ (ALARP) and creates an unacceptable risk of
             The company was correctly concerned with this report. It  personal injury as a result of a slip, trip or fall. The risk
             emerged that there had been no previous order for a new
                                                               should  have  been  mitigated  by  a  post  build  design
             valve,  no  record  or  explanation  of  the  blanks,  and  no  initiative to have a grated walkway over the top of the
             discussion at the time with the company office or at ship
                                                               pipes.
             staff handover.
                                                               Please  refer  to  article  in  Alert!  Number  01275  –
             CHIRP Suggests
                                                               http://www.he-alert.org/en/utilities/download.cfm/fid/
             The  company  took  admirable  steps  to  emphasise  the  E9558858-316B-4C74-87DD26DE5E815204.
             importance  of  timely  and  open  ship/shore  dialogue.
             Frequent  communication  between  the  office  super -  CHIRP comment  on  the  second  photograph,  the
             intendent(s) and the vessel can assist with this. In the first  minimum  head  clearance  at  all  locations  onboard  is
             instance a material defect was concealed, and not rectified,  stipulated as 2.1 Metres: This was not complied with in
             with potentially severe consequences: pollution, injury,  this case.
             and/or pipeline damage. We may surmise, but cannot          The above article was published in MFB45
             know, the original reasons. The case is a clear illustration
             of poor prevalent safety culture at the time.

                       The above article was published in MFB44  Article. 42
                                                               Machinery Space Finger Injuries
             Article. 41                                       This joint article includes reports relating to fingers being
             Ouch! – Bad Ship Designs                          caught  in  the  belt  of  an  air  conditioning  blower  and
             We encourage seafarers to submit examples of bad design.  fingertips amputated during maintenance of an auxiliary
             Please  include  photographs,  since  a  picture  speaks  a  engine.
             thousand words! We can share two such reports with you
             here.                                             What did the reporters tell us?

             What did the reporter tell us?                      Apparently E/O fingers got trapped
             A photograph of a poorly designed pilot boarding area. The
                                                                 between the belt and the pulley
             pipes  are  tripping  hazards  and  there  is  an  irony  of
             positioning them in an area that has a clear to read sign
             stencilled onto the deck telling people to keep the area
             clear. Also, please find attached a photo showing poor
             design onboard a ship I piloted. I am 188 cm tall and as
             you can see, the light fitting comes down to less than
             180,cm right in the middle of the bridge toilet room. I have
             found this same situation on a number of vessels. Although
             it didn’t cause injury it has the potential to do so.


                                                               (1)  The electrical officer (E/O) and fitter were performing
                                                                  routine maintenance on the air conditioner blowers.
                                                                  After completion of greasing of the two blowers, the
                                                                  E/O switched on the power of the system to test the
                                                                  system. The no. 2 blower was observed by the E/O to
                                                                  be drawing excess current. To investigate the case, he
                                                                  switched off the power to the No. 2 blower with the
                                                                  intention to check the tension of the belt between
                                                                  the blower’s motor and the fan. For this purpose, after



                                                            49
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55