Page 23 - Relations and Functions 19.10.06.pmd
P. 23

RELATIONS AND FUNCTIONS    23

                           For the binary operation ‘+’ on R, the interesting feature of the number zero is that
                       a + 0 = a = 0 + a, i.e., any number remains unaltered by adding zero. But in case of
                       multiplication, the number 1 plays this role, as a × 1 = a = 1 × a,  ∀  a in R. This leads
                       to the following definition:
                       Definition 13 Given a binary operation ∗ : A × A → A, an element e ∈ A, if it exists,
                       is called identity for the operation ∗, if a ∗ e = a = e ∗ a,  ∀  a ∈ A.

                       Example 38 Show that zero is the identity for addition on R and 1 is the identity for
                       multiplication on R. But there is no identity element for the operations
                                           – : R × R → R and ÷ : R  × R  → R .
                                                                  ∗    ∗     ∗
                       Solution a + 0 = 0 + a = a and a × 1 = a = 1 × a,  ∀ a ∈ R implies that 0 and 1 are
                       identity elements for the operations ‘+’ and ‘×’ respectively. Further, there is no element
                       e in R with a – e = e – a,  a. Similarly, we can not find any element e in R  such that
                                             ∀
                                                                                         ∗
                       a ÷ e = e ÷ a,  ∀ a in R . Hence, ‘–’ and ‘÷’ do not have identity element.
                                            ∗
                       Remark Zero is identity for the addition operation on R but it is not identity for the
                       addition operation on N, as 0 ∉ N. In fact the addition operation on N does not have
                       any identity.
                           One further notices that for the addition operation + : R × R → R, given any
                       a ∈ R, there exists – a in R such that a + (– a) = 0 (identity for ‘+’) = (– a) + a.

                                                                                                1
                       Similarly, for the multiplication operation on R, given any a ≠ 0 in R, we can choose
                                                                                                a
                                       1                    1
                       in R such that a ×   = 1(identity for ‘×’) =  × a. This leads to the following definition:
                                       a                    a
                       Definition 14 Given a binary operation ∗ : A × A → A with the identity element e in A,
                       an element a ∈ A is said to be invertible with respect to the operation ∗, if there exists
                       an element b in A such that a ∗ b = e = b ∗ a and b is called the inverse of a and is
                       denoted by a .
                                   –1
                       Example 39 Show that – a is the inverse of a for the addition operation ‘+’ on R and
                        1
                        a   is the inverse of a ≠ 0 for the multiplication operation ‘×’ on R.

                       Solution As a + (– a) = a – a = 0 and (– a) + a = 0, – a is the inverse of a for addition.
                                           1      1              1
                       Similarly, for a ≠ 0, a × = 1 =  × a implies that   is the inverse of a for multiplication.
                                           a      a              a
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28