Page 66 - The 'X' Chronicles Newspaper March/April 2018 Edition
P. 66

66                       The Travis Walton Abduction Case






                 The Travis Walton

              Abduction Case: Fact,

              Fiction Or Psychosis?

           You be the Judge & Jury



                  Continued from Page 65



          “Our conclusion, which was absolute, is that
          this young man is not lying, that there is no
          collusion involved.  The full test results show
          that he really believes these things, that he is not
          lying. He really believes that he was abducted
          by a UFO.”
                 Rosenbaum then went on to offer his
          own interpretation of the episode:
                 “But my evaluation of the boy’s story is
          that, although he believes this is what happened,
          it was all in his own mind. I feel that he suffered
          from a combination of imagination and amnesia
          and transitory psychosis - that he did not go on
          a UFO, but simply was wandering around
          during the period of his disappearance. But I’m
          unable to account for five witnesses having the  Walton has answered all questions in a manner  Later the “investigator” acknowledged that he
          same basic story and passing lie-detector tests  that he himself is firmly convinced to be truth  had based his statements on newspaper
          about it”                                       regarding the incident commencing 11-5-75.”    accounts. The Mutual UFO Network (MUFON)
                 Nor would Rosenbaum’s hypothesis                Pfiefer also conducted a polygraph      also treated the case cautiously, citing both sides
          explain how  Travis could have maintained       examination on Mary Kellett.  Those who        of the dispute, without taking sides.  APRO’s
          relative good health, or even stayed alive, over  thought that  Travis’s disappearance had been  treatment, the most comprehensive was the only
          five nights of well-below-freezing temperatures  staged suspected that his mother would almost  wholly positive one, though it made much of the
          - especially considering that the clothes he was  certainly know of the hoax; some speculated  Pfiefer tests, it neglected to mention the failed
          wearing were manifestly not suited to such      that he had hidden in her Bear Springs cabin. So  examination with McCarthy.
          bitter cold. Moreover, formal psychological     Pfiefer asked her if she had been participating in     So did the National Enquirer in its
          testing of  Travis by  APRO-affiliated          a hoax, if she had concealed Travis, and if she  December 16, 1975, issue even though its
          psychologists Harold Cahn and R. Leo Sprinkle   knew where Travis was between November 5       reporters   had    privately   voiced    their
          would uncover no evidence of emotional          and 10. She answered no to these questions.    disenchantment with the case to the Lorenzens a
          abnormality.                                    Pfiefer also wanted to know if she believed    day after the McCarthy  examination. One of
                 In any event, it was apparent to just    Travis was telling the truth. She said yes. Pfiefer  them, Jeff  Wells, prepared a 16-page memo
          about everybody except McCarthy that the        wrote:                                         urging that the story be killed. Unlike
          polygraph test had been a bad idea. Then the           “After a careful analysis of the        McCarthy, the reporters did not believe Travis
          Waltons, National Enquirer, McCarthy, and       polygrams produced and comparing the           had perpetrated a hoax; they were persuaded by
          APRO signed onto another bad idea: they         polygram tracings with Known Lie pattern, it is  Dr. Rosenbaum that he had had a psychological
          agreed to keep the test and its results         the opinion of this examiner that Mrs. Mary    experience. As Wells recalled in 1981, “He had
          confidential. Hardly anyone else would hear of  Kellett has answered all the questions truthfully  seen something out there in the woods, some
          the incident until eight months later, when the  according to the best of her knowledge and    kind of an eerie light that had triggered a
          Walton case’s most intense and persistent critic  beliefs.”                                    powerful hallucination that might recur at
          exposed it to the world.                               In 1992 Pfiefer reaffirmed his          anytime.”
                 On February 7, 1976, Duane took a        confidence in these conclusions.                       A far more formidable and serious attack
          polygraph test administered by George J.                                                       on the case was launched by Philip J. Klass in
          Pfiefer, Jr., of Tom Ezell and Associates. Travis THE CONTROVERSY                              June 1976. Klass, by profession an editor of the
          hoped to be there as well, but APRO had not            Even in the absence of clear evidence of  Washington weekly Aviation  Week and Space
          made an appointment for him because he was      a hoax - as well as ignorance of the suppressed  Technology, issued 17 pages’ worth of
          having car trouble and it was by no means       McCarthy test - Spaulding continued his assault  accusations against virtually everyone -
          certain that he would be able to negotiate the  on the case, telling journalists and ufologists  investigator, polygraph examiner, and alleged
          160 miles between Snowflake and Phoenix. But    that the  Waltons were lying. Persons          witness - who in one way or another supported
          as it happened, Travis made it. He asked if he  knowledgeable about the case sometimes found   the case.  A ferocious UFO debunker who
          could take the test after Duane was through.    his logic hard to follow. He wrote, for example,  seldom hesitated to hurl hoax charges against
          Drs. Harold Cahn and  T. Leo Sprinkle and       “Walton never boarded the UFO.  This fact is   witnesses ordinarily deemed reliable (including
          APRO director Jim Lorenzen drew up a list of    supported by the six witnesses and the [Gilson]  police officers and members of the clergy),
          questions, and later Travis added some others.  polygraph test results.” Spaulding did not     Klass approached the Walton episode less as an
          Travis wanted the test to cover other accusations  elaborate on this curious contention.       investigator then as a prosecutor.
          that had been leveled at him.                          Still, other UFO groups were willing to         His   most     damaging     revelation
                 Pfiefer concluded as follows:            take Spaulding at his word.  The National      concerned the McCarthy examination and
                 “It is the opinion of this examiner that  Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena  APRO’s role in covering it up. Jim Lorenzen
          Duane  Walton has answered all questions        (NICAP) inaccurately characterized the         would subsequently defend his organization’s
          truthfully according to what he believes to be  incident as a “contactee case”, complained     action, saying that the results were meaningless
          the truth regarding this incident, and he has not  about the “undue excitement and interest” it had  - probably true, but hardly the point. Klass got
          attempted to be deceptive in any area...        generated, and remarked that “either a hoax had  the story from McCarthy, who had decided to
                 After a careful analysis of the polygrams  been committed or...a psychological phenomena  speak out because of the continuing attention
          produced, there are no areas left unresolved, and  is involved.” It cited as authority its     Walton’s claims were receiving.
          it is the opinion of this examiner that  Travis  “investigator” an Arizona university professor.                      (Continued on Page 67)
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71