Page 12 - Albanian law on entrepreuners and companies - text with with commentary
P. 12

Some voices claimed that these incidences were only exceptions which affirmed the rule
            of  functioning  global  corporate  governance  systems.  But  by  far  the  majority  of  experts,
            governments and international  organizations recognized that  the complexity of the  modern
                                                                               16
            networks  of  companies  and  financial  markets  with  their  ‘epidemic  conflicts  of  interest’
            require  regulatory  measures  to  address  common  structural  and  functional  problems.  The
            reluctance to simply get back to ‘business as usual’ derives from the fact that large national
            and multi-national companies are increasingly becoming ‘social trustees’ for the existence of
            millions of people beyond the employment factor: in times of ailing public pension systems,
            shares in investment and pension funds which invest their capital in business companies have
            become  an  option  for  the  future  welfare  of  entire  populations.  The  debate  brought  about
                              17
            regulatory  interventions,   and  the  global  establishment  of  Corporate  Governance  Codes,
                                 18
            Principles  and  Guidelines,   sometimes  classified  as  ‘soft  law’.  As  a  result,  company
            constitutions’ have been ‘taken seriously’ and are increasingly ‘enforced’ by national, supra-
            and international public law makers and organizations in order to reset their corresponding
            legal  frameworks for the continuous adaptation, implementation and control of companies’
            corporate  governance  and  corporate  social  responsibility.  This  is  why  there  is  now  a
            Corporate Governance Code in Albania.
                 The  EU  and  its  Member  States  have  been  actively  involved  in  these  developments.
                                                 19
            Based on important research and reform proposals,  the EU published an ‘Action Plan on the
            Modernization  of  Company  Law  and  the  Improvement  of  Corporate  Governance  in  the
                                       20
            European Union’ on 21 May 2003.  The Action Plan announced an authentic shift  of the
            EU’s company law strategy. While EU company law-making from the late 1960s until the
            middle of the  1990s focused on structural  harmonization of Member States’ company  and
            accountancy laws, legal  approximation  which is  now  enshrined in both  EU legislation and
            soft law appears to be part of risk and crisis management in order to protect shareholders,
            market participants, and other social interests and to strengthen the competitive capacity of
            EU companies. The previous approach and in particular the First, Second, Fourth and Seventh
            Directive aimed at providing equal conditions for companies in the Internal Market. In this
            respect,  the  necessary  cross-border  mobility  of  Member  State  companies  was,  above  all,


            16  In this respect, we recommend G. Rossi,  Il conflitto epidemico (Adelphi, 2003). Given the transversal institutional
            presence of conflicts of interest in economy and politics, it would be more adequate to call it ‘endemic’.
            17  Cf. the US American Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 “to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of
            corporate disclosure made pursuant to the securities laws, and for other purposes”.
            18    Most   prominently   the   2004   Revised   OECD   ‘Principles   of   Corporate   Governance’
            (http://www.oecd.org/document/49/0,3746,en)  and  the  2000  OECD  ‘Guidelines  for  Multinational  2011  Enterprises.’
            (http://www.oecd.org/document/28/0,3746,en) .Both are part of the same ‘corporate constitutionalization’ (cf. J. Dine,
            Companies, International Trade and Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2005)). Also see the huge comparative
            study on corporate governance codes and practices undertaken 2002 by Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP on behalf of the
            European  Commission  and  in  consultation  with  the  European  Association  of  Securities  Dealers  and  the  European
            Corporate Governance Network.
            19   Cf.  the  Report  of  the  ‘High  Level  Group  of  Company  Law  Experts’  on  ‘A  Modern  Regulatory  Framework  for
            Company Law in Europe’. It can be found at: http:/europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/en/company/company/
            modern/index.htm and see the latest news on the initiative in
            http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/company/modern/index_en.htm.
            20  COM (2003) 284 final. The document can be found on the aforementioned website.
                                                                              11
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17