Page 216 - Albanian law on entrepreuners and companies - text with with commentary
P. 216

‘European fortress’ may very  well reconsider using the ‘old’ instruments of the regulatory
                                     212
            state when its interests so require.
                 As regards the Albanian Company Law, there are no restrictions of this kind. Article
            213  reflects  the  general  ‘openness’  of  company  law  towards  the  possibility  of  state
            participation  in  the  economy.  The  public  authorities  may  use  any  company  form  when
            pursuing  their  general  economic  interests,  Article  213  (1).  Company  Law  applies  for
            formation and operation,  Article  213 (2). Moreover,  Article  213 (1) makes it possible that
            public authorities may not only create wholly-owned companies, as Article 94 of the old Law
            No.  7638  had  required,  but  also  take  the  ‘parent’  role  of  Articles  207 to 212  to  control  a
            company  pursuant  to  their  general  economic  policies.  This  does  not  exclude  that  a  public
            authority holds a minor share in a company. The company simply could not be called any
            more ‘state-owned’.

            2.   The fact that public authorities may be ‘parents’ in the sense of the new Law of Groups
            (Articles 206 to 212) is another interesting feature of the new Law. It shows, first of all, that
            the Law itself applies the parent-subsidiary rules where a group constellation is considered
            important enough to extend those rules to other economic actors than ‘companies’ (see above
            Comment before Article 206). Second, the Law recognizes that public authorities must also
            abide by the rules they created for the conduct of private interests when they use them for
            public  interests.  The  ‘conflicts  of  interests’  involved  demand  this  treatment.  This  was
            confirmed by the German Federal Court which ended a famous debate on the ‘parent’ role of
                             213
            the state in the 1970s.  However, the fact that the recent corporate governance debate has
            widened  the  definition  of  companies’  interests  by  developing  increasingly  standards  of
            corporate social responsibility,  must be taken into account  when the triple set  of  fiduciary
            duties  and  interests  is  coordinated  in  accordance  with  Articles  209  and  210  (see  above
            Comments to Article 98, and before Article 206).


                                           PART IX
              RESTRUCTURING OF LIMITED LIABILITY AND JOINT STOCK COMPANIES

            Comments:

            1.   Flexible  economic  management  of  company  structures  and  the  creation  of  company
            networks often require the merging of companies, their transformation into other company
            forms or their division and the ‘outsourcing’ of parts which are integrated into independent
            companies  which,  for  example,  may  be  managed  as  ‘joint  ventures’  together  with  other
            interested  companies.  If  special  provisions  on  restructuring  were  missing,  fulfilment  of  a

            212  Cf. EU Trade Commissioner P. Mandelson’s speech ‘Europe’s openness and the politics of globalization’, Alcuin
            Lecture in Cambridge on 8 February 8 2008.
            213  Volume 69, p. 334 et seq. of the collection of the jurisprudence of the Federal Court (BGHZ 69, p. 334 et seq.),
            ‘Veba-Gelsenberg’.
                                                                             215
   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221