Page 149 - BLACK SKIN, WHITE MASK
P. 149

110 BLACK SKIN, WHITE MASKS



                                grown up in a normal family will be a normal man.  There is no
                                                                            2
                                disproportion between the life of the family and the life of the
                                nation. Conversely, when one examines a closed society—that is, a
                                society that has been protected from the fl ood of civilization—one
                                encounters the same structures as those just described. Father
                                Trilles’ L’âme du Pygmée d’Afrique, for instance, convinces us
                                of that; although with every word one is aware of the need to
                                Christianize the savage Negro soul, the book’s description of the
                                whole culture—the conditions of worship, the persistence of rites,
                                the survival of myths—has nothing of the artifi cial impression
                                given by La philosophie bantoue.
                                  In both cases the characteristics of the family are projected onto
                                the social environment. It is true that the children of pickpockets
                                or burglars, accustomed to a certain system of clan law, would
                                be surprised to fi nd that the rest of the world behaved differently,
                                but a new kind of training—except in instances of perversion or
                                arrested development (Heuyer) —should be able to direct them
                                                           3
                                into a moralization, a socialization of outlook.
                                  It is apparent in all such cases that the sickness lies in the family
                                environment.

                                  For the individual the authority of the state is a reproduction of the
                                  authority of the family by which he was shaped in his childhood. Ultimately
                                  the individual assimilates all the authorities that he meets to the authority
                                  of the parents: He perceives the present in terms of the past. Like all other
                                  human conduct, behavior toward authority is something, learned. And it is
                                  learned in the heart of a family that can be described, from the psychological

                                2.  I should like to think that I am not going to be brought to trial for this sentence.
                                  Skeptics always have a fi ne time asking, “What do you mean by normal?” For
                                  the moment, it is beyond the scope of this book to answer the question. In order
                                  to pacify the more insistent, let me refer them to the extremely instructive work
                                  by Georges Canguilhem, Essai sur quelques problèmes concernant le normal et le
                                  pathologique (Paris, Société d’Editions, 1950), even though its sole orientation is
                                  biological. And let me add only that in the psychological sphere the abnormal man
                                  is he who demands, who appeals, who begs.
                                3.  Although even this reservation is open to argument. See for example the question
                                  put by Mlle. Juliette Boutonnier: “Might not perversion be an extreme arrest in
                                  affect development, furthered, if not produced, by the conditions under which the
                                  child has lived, at least as much as by the congenital tendencies that are obviously
                                  factors in it but that probably are not alone responsible?” (Revue Française de
                                  Psychanalyse, No. 3, 1949, pp. 403–404.)








                                                                                         4/7/08   14:16:49
                        Fanon 01 text   110                                              4/7/08   14:16:49
                        Fanon 01 text   110
   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154