Page 10 - Afrika Must Unite
P. 10

Xll                   INTRODUCTION

                O ut  of this  conviction,  I  am  necessarily  as  much  concerned
              with the problems of all the different countries which make up
              our great continent as  I am with those of Ghana.  I have, there­
              fore,  drawn for illustration  upon  all patterns  of colonialism.  If
              there  does  at  times  appear  to  be  an  emphasis  upon  the  British
              pattern and upon events in Ghana, it is because these are part of
              my  personal  experience.  They  have  been  to  a  considerable
              extent the agencies that have moulded my intellectual processes
              and political philosophy.  But  I  have  also,  as  an African  and  a
              political being drawn into the vortex of African affairs out of my
              dedication to the cause of Africa’s freedom and unity, sustained
              an  indelible  impression from  the  experience  of my  continental
              brothers under other colonial rulers.
                Their history of colonialist subjection differs from ours only in
              detail  and  degree,  not in  kind.  Some  there  are  who  make  fine
              distinctions between one brand of colonialism and another, who
              declare that the British are ‘better’  masters than the French, or
              the  French  ‘better’  than  the  Belgian,  or  the  Portuguese  or  the
              white  settlers  of South  Africa,  as  though  there  is  virtue  in  the
              degree  to  which slavery is  enforced.  Such  specious  differentia­
              tions come from those who have never experienced the miseries
              and  degradation  of  colonialist  suppression  and  exploitation.
              More frequently they are apologists for the colonialism of their
              own country, anxious out of jingoistic patriotism to make a case
              for it.
                The  colonial  subject,  the  true  bearer  of  the  ‘white  m an’s
              burden’, can have no such philosophical approach. He is, there­
              fore,  unable  to judge the delicate difference between having to
              pass  through  a  door m arked  ‘natives’  in  any part of the world
              and one so marked in Johannesburg,  simply because  the latter
              would often be in  a separate,  segregated  area.
                W hatever  the  means  used  by  the  colonialists,  the  objective
              was  the  same.  It  was  not  that  a  nasty-minded  bunch  of men
              awoke  simultaneously  one  morning  in  England,  France,
              Belgium,  Germany,  Portugal,  or  in  any  other  of the  colonial
              countries,  and  decided  that  it would  be  a  good  thing  to jum p
              into Africa and grind the people’s noses in the dust so that they
              could  all  of them retire  to  their homelands in  due  course,  rich
              and happy from the Africans’ hardship. It was a good deal more
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15