Page 119 - Afrika Must Unite
P. 119

104               AFRICA  MUST  UNITE

               a  less  developed  society  there  are  several  impediments  to  in­
               dustrialization,  quite  apart  from  the  lack  of requisite  capital
               accumulations,  technical  skills,  scientific  knowledge  and  in­
               dustrial  enterprise,  which,  unless  they  are  eliminated,  will
               stultify our efforts  at  advancement.  For  they have  their  cumu­
               lative effect precisely in the lack of these requisite reserves.
                  Customs which extol the virtues of extended family allegiance
               sustain  nepotic  practices,  and  regard  the  giving  and  taking  of
               ‘presents’ as implicit and noble, because they promote the family
               welfare.  They  encourage  indolence  and  bribery,  they  act  as  a
               brake  upon  ability,  they  discourage  that  deeper  sense  of in­
               dividual responsibility which must be ready in a period of active
               reconstruction  to  accept  obligation  and  fulfil  trust.  Above  all,
               they retard productivity and oppose savings,  the crucial factors
               in the rate of development. Polygamy donates its quota to these
               retarding  influences,  while  our  laws  of  succession  and  in­
               heritance stifle the creative and inventive urge.
                  It  is  certainly  not  accidental  that  the  industrial  revolution
               came first to England, where the law of primogeniture entailed
               the inheritance of estates to the eldest son and made it necessary
               for the younger ones  to follow pursuits which increased capital
               wealth.  The  historian,  G.  M.  Trevelyan writes:


                   A distinguishing feature of the English gentry,  which aston­
                 ished foreign visitors as early as the reign of Henry VII, was their
                 habit of turning their younger sons out of the manor-house  to
                 seek their fortunes elsewhere, usually as apprentices to thriving
                 merchants and craftsmen in the towns.  Foreigners ascribed the
                 custom  to  English  want  of family  affection.  But  it  was  also,
                 perhaps,  a wise instinct of ‘what was best for the boy,’  as well
                 as a shrewd calculation of what was best for the family fortunes.
                 The habit of leaving all the land and most of the money to the
                 eldest son built up  the great estates,  which by steady accumu­
                 lation down the years, became by Hanoverian times so marked
                 a feature of English rural economy.

                   The younger son of the Tudor gentleman was not permitted
                 to  hang  idle  about  the  manor-house,  a  drain  on  the  family
                 income like the impoverished nobles of the Continent who were
                 too proud to work.  He was away making money in trade or in
   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124