Page 198 - Afrika Must Unite
P. 198

NEO-COLONIALISM  IN  AFRICA
      economic weakness, a weakness which can be corrected through
      unity  of action  between  the  different  raw  m aterial  producing
      countries,  and  not  through  exclusive  trading  arrangements
      between  the  strong  and  the  weak.  The  case  of Daniel  and  the
      lions may occasionally come out right,  but it is not a safe basis
      for  economic  planning.
        The pattern of imperialist aid to Africa is set not only to draw
      the unwary back into the neo-colonialist relationship but to tie
      them  into cold-war politics. This has been amply explained by
      M r  W alt  W hitm an  Rostow,  Counsellor  and  Chairm an  of the
      Policy  Planning  Council  of the  U.S.  State  Departm ent,  in  an
      interview  given  to  the  weekly journal,  U.S.  News  and  World
      Report.1 Asked what America is doing about the underdeveloped
      areas, M r Rostow refers to the ‘gradual creation of a pattern to
      succeed  the  colonial period.  We  helped pioneer this pattern in
      our relationship with the  Philippines’. After commenting upon
      the  new relationships established with  their former colonies by
      Britain, France and Belgium, who ‘is making an im portant con­
      tinuing contribution to the Congo,’ he states th a t: ‘As the residual
      problems  are  solved  we  look,  as  I  say,  to  a  new  partnership
      based  on  the  common  interests  of the  northern  and  southern
      parts of the free world.’  This M r Rostow admits is a long-term
      process.  ‘In playing the game in the underdeveloped areas you
      must be prepared to play for a long tim e,’ and hence, in some of
      the underdeveloped countries,  ‘as in most of Africa, we have to
      start from a very low level -  with specific projects, not national plans
      of a sophisticated kind'2  For, says M r Rostow, using the  examples
      of Italy and Greece in the M arshall Plan period, ‘we are buying
      time to protect crucial pieces of real estate -  and the possibility
      of hum an freedom for those who lived there. And in the end we
      sweated  it  out  and  won.  .  .  .  Buying  time  is  one  of the  most
      expensive  and  thankless  things  we  do  with  our  money  -   as  in
      South  Korea.’
        This is perhaps one of the most cynical but clear-cut summings
      up  that  has  ever  appeared  in  print  of the  approach  of a  rich
      power to  the needs  and hopes  of the  new nations of the world.
      1  Dated 7 May 1962. This journal is published in W ashington by the United
      States News Publishing Corporation.
      2  Italics  added.
   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203