Page 53 - The Insurance Times November 2024
P. 53

CASE STUDY



             Fire Incident at Textile Manufacturing


                                                      plant





         Introduction                                            months, causing considerable losses in revenue and
                                                                 delays in order fulfillment, with an overall impact on
         In industrial operations, especially those involving hazard-
         ous or flammable materials, the potential for fire incidents  customer relationships and business reputation.
         poses a substantial threat. Fire insurance is a crucial ele-  The estimated loss amounted to INR 20 crore, with both
         ment of risk management in these environments, protect-  direct and indirect financial impacts severely affecting the
         ing against significant financial losses and operational set-  plant’s financial health.
         backs. However, insurance alone is insufficient without a  Insurance Coverage and Underinsurance
         proactive approach to risk management, including routine
         assessments, policy reviews, and rigorous safety measures. Analysis

         This case study examines a fire incident at a textile manu-  Despite having fire insurance in place, the plant’s coverage
         facturing plant in Maharashtra, India, highlighting the role  fell short of adequately compensating for the total losses.
         of fire insurance and analyzing the effects of underinsur-  The policy covered basic property, equipment, and a clause
         ance. It delves into the root causes of the incident, the  for business interruption. However, several coverage gaps
         scope of losses, and, most importantly, key risk manage-  surfaced due to inadequate asset valuations, out-of-date
         ment lessons that could prevent similar situations in the  policy terms, and a failure to address rising asset values.
         future.                                                 Policy Coverage: The fire insurance policy had a limit
         Incident Overview                                       of INR 12 crore. This was based on older valuations and
                                                                 did not fully account for recent expansions and addi-
         The fire broke out in the early hours at a textile plant(Actual  tions in machinery, inventory, and infrastructure. While
         Name not disclosed)  known for producing cotton and syn-  the insurer covered direct damages to equipment, raw
         thetic fabrics. Originating from an electrical short circuit in  materials, and some business interruption, the total
         the weaving section, the fire quickly spread, fueled by highly  reimbursement reached only about 60% of the total
         flammable materials like cotton, polyester, and synthetic  financial impact.
         fabrics stored in close proximity to the electrical units. By
         the time employees noticed the smoke, the fire had already  Evidence of Underinsurance: The disparity between
         engulfed a large portion of the facility. Efforts to control  the actual value of assets lost and the policy coverage
         the blaze were delayed by the lack of advanced fire sup-  limit indicated clear underinsurance. The company had
         pression systems, leaving the standard fire extinguishers  not reviewed or updated its policy limits for over five
         insufficient for the task.                              years, during which time asset values had increased, and
         The fire caused extensive damage across multiple        significant investments had been made in machinery.
         areas:                                                  Causes of Underinsurance: The main reason for un-
             Property and Equipment: Large sections of the plant,  derinsurance stemmed from a lack of routine policy re-
             including critical weaving and dyeing machinery, were  views. The company had underestimated the value of
             destroyed.                                          assets and omitted recently acquired machinery from
                                                                 the policy. Additionally, the company did not account
             Inventory Loss: Raw materials (cotton and synthetic  for inflation and replacement costs, resulting in an
             fibers) and finished products were burned beyond re-  underinsured position when the incident occurred. The
             covery.
                                                                 lack of alignment between asset values and insurance
             Structural Damage: Significant parts of the storage and  coverage led to a gap that required the company to
             production facilities required complete reconstruction.  bear substantial out-of-pocket expenses for recovery
             Business Interruption: Production ceased for over six  and rebuilding.

                                                                           The Insurance Times  November 2024  47
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58