Page 17 - BANKING FINANCE November 2015 ONLINE
P. 17

LEGAL UPDATE

Nominee is a mere custodian of deposit                                               Refund not the final out-

The Delhi High Court had ruled that       But the postal authorities insisted on     come end of bank fraud
the bequest in a will shall supersede     paying the nominee only. They quoted
the nomination in a bank account. The     the Government Savings Bank Act            trial
petitioner in this case was a former Su-  1873, under which the payment must
preme Court judge, U. N. Bachawat,        be paid only to the nominee without        The Supreme Court had stated in the
whose wife had bequeathed                                                            judgment, Central Bureau of Inves-
to him two deposits in a                                any exception. The ex-       tigation vs Maninder that in a case
Delhi post office bank.                                 judge argued that the        of fraud against a bank, the accused
When he claimed the                                     nominee was only a custo-    person cannot get away by 'settling'
amount in accordance with                               dian of the funds and they   the criminal complaint by repaying
the will, the postal authori-                           should be paid to the lega-  the amount involved.
ties rejected his request                               tee.
maintaining that it was the                                                          The complaint was that the accused
nominee who was entitled to the                         Accepting his contention     person opened a current account in
money. In this case, the nominee was      and following judgments of the Su-         the name of a firm with Punjab Na-
his grandson. He had relinquished the     preme Court in LIC and other cases,        tional Bank in Ludhiana and got an
claim and asked the postal authorities    the high court affirmed the principle      advance. Later, the vigilance officer
to pay his grandfather according to the   that a nomination did not expel the        of the bank found that the bill of lad-
will of his grandmother.                  testamentary and non-testamentary          ing produced by him was forged.
                                          rights.                                    Therefore, Maninder was arrested
                                                                                     and criminal prosecution was
Cheque as security should not bounce                                                 launched against him under the pe-
                                                                                     nal code provisions and the Preven-
The Delhi High Court last week reversed the acquittal of two persons who de-         tion of Corruption Act.
                               posited a cheque as security with a firm which con-
                               ducted trading in shares on credit basis. When the    He moved to the Delhi high court
                               cheque bounced, the firm filed complaint against the  claiming that he had settled the af-
                               two persons.                                          fair with the bank after paying the
                                                                                     amount and, therefore, the com-
                               The Delhi magistrate acquitted them on the ground     plaint should be quashed. The court
that the cheque was issued as security and not in discharge of any debt or li-       did so.
ability as mentioned in the Negotiable Instruments Act. Moreover, when the
cheque was handed over, there was no transaction between the parties. The            Therefore, the CBI filed an appeal.
firm appealed to the high court, and in the judgment, Credential Leasing &           Allowing the appeal, the Court stated
Credits Ltd vs Shruti Investments, the court held that the magistrate applied        the high court should not have exer-
wrong principles to acquit the accused persons.                                      cised its discretion to quash the
                                                                                     complaint without adequate reason.
It ruled that the debt or other liability need not be in existence on the date of    "In such economic offences, Court
issuance of the cheque, i.e. on the date of its delivery to the drawee on the        must not only keep in view that
date that the cheque bears. The only reference to time in Section 138 is the         money has been paid to the bank
point of time when the cheque is returned unpaid by the drawer's bank.               which has been defrauded but also
                                                                                     society at large.
Green bench orders pollution fee for trucks entering
                                                                                     It is not a case of simple assault or a
Delhi                                                                                theft of a trivial amount; but the of-
                                                                                     fence with which we are concerned
All commercial vehicles entering Delhi must pay an environmental compensation        is a well planned and was committed
charge in addition to toll tax, the National Green Tribunal ruled. The tribunal      with a deliberate design with an eye
ordered the compensation be payable at the rate of Rs 700 for two-axle vehicles,     of personal profit regardless of con-
Rs 1,000 for three-axle vehicles and Rs 500 for four-axle and above vehicles. It     sequence to the society at large.
also ruled all vehicles destined for places other than Delhi be diverted.

BANKING FINANCE |                                                                    NOVEMBER | 2015 | 17

Copyright@ The Insurance Times. 09883398055 / 09883380339
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22