Page 19 - The Insurance Times June 2020
P. 19

important aspect of these two policy/Covers is that  Insurance policies claims are admissible as also concerned
             they are not independent standalone policies. While LOP  Authorities have confirm the position by press releases
             is to be taken in conjunction with a 'Material Damage  addressed to the insuring public. However, regarding LOP
             policy (Fire or Machinery Breakdown Policies), the IAR  and IAR, as on date it is not an insured peril. Even if the
             policy has two sections. Section I is Material Damage  meaning of 'All Risks Perils" is stretched to include Pandemic
             Section, whereas Section II is Business Interruption  as an insured peril, non-compliance of other important
             Section. The concept on which both the policies operate  condition of 'Admissible claim for Damage under Material
             is that there has to have admissible claim for "Physical  Damage Policy/Section as also excluded cause of 'Cessation
             Loss, Damage or Destruction (Damage)" to the insured  of Work' will prevent claimant from establishing claim under
             property under Material Damage Policy/Section I,  Business Interruption Policy/Section.
             which will trigger claim for Business Interruption loss
             under LOP or Section II of IAR Policies.         In the current situation Reinsurers and Insurers have
                                                              excluded any kind of loss for Communicable diseases by
         An impression has been created that Since Material Damage  express warranties but over a period consideration of
         Section (Section I) of IAR policy operates on 'ALL RISKS' basis  such peril may become reality for policies like Interruption
         and since Pandemic is not an excluded peril, it automatically  cover for business & supply chains, surety & credit Insurance,
         covers Pandemic as an Insured peril. This interpretation may  Contingency cover for Event cancellations, travel related
         or may not be correct but to say that this automatically  insurance, health policies, workers compensation insurance,
         covers loss due to lockdown related business interruption.  employers' liability insurance, Life and retirement savings
         This position is totally wrong. For any claim to generate  insurance etc. Insurers and Reinsurers have shown
         under Section II, precondition is that there must be an  their capability to accept many challenging situations and
         admissible claim due to "Physical Loss, Damage or    they will surely come forward to meet this kind of challenges
         Destruction" to the insured property under Section I of the  also. They will be well prepared with current experience and
         Policy. Moreover, the Exclusion Causes under the policy inter  data.
         alia includes "Cessation of work, delay or loss of market or
         any other consequential or indirect loss of any kind or  To overcome constrain of concept of 'Admissible claim for
         description whatsoever".                             physical Damage under Material Damage Policy/Section of
                                                              LOP and IAR policies, cover for Pandemic induced Business
         'COVID19" is definitely an insured or insurable peril, which  Interruption can be provided by modification of policy
         is established by the fact that under Health and Life  wordings and/or by a special proviso. T


                     Life insurers look to hedge against policy surrenders
           Life insurers are keeping a close watch on surrenders and persistency numbers, as individuals may not be in a situation
           to pay premiums or continue their policies because of financial uncertainties. As a remedy, life insurers are looking to
           provide short-term credit - known as bridge loans - to policyholders.
           Such loans come at a cheaper rate than personal loans, and can be repaid whenever the policyholder wants. Typically,
           these loans are available against traditional policies, which generally attract high surrender charges.
           There is a likelihood of customers wanting to dip into some of their past investments and encash them, given the
           current liquidity crunch and overall economic scenario, with the possibility of job losses, said Manu Lavanya, director
           and chief operations officer of Max Life Insurance.
           "We are closely monitoring our persistency and surrenders at the company and product levels - especially for unit-
           linked products. The facility of loans against policy may enable customers to manage the situation better. We have
           reached out to the regulator and are in discussions over allowing loans against ULIPS," said Vibha Padalkar, MD and
           CEO of HDFC Life, in an interview to Business Standard.
           "The loan facility is already available with traditional policies. This, we believe, will enable customers to make payments
           and continue with their policies, instead of having to surrender them," she added.
           "When our branches open up for business, we are likely to receive higher (though not exponential) volumes (loan requests)
           but are equipped to both engage and retain while refunding, where the customer isn't keen to continue," said Lavanya.

                                                                           The Insurance Times, June 2020 19
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24