Page 40 - Banking Fiannce March 2018
P. 40

FEATURE

         Understanding Interest Rate Risk at                     weighted average maturity of cash-flows of bonds in the
                                                                 portfolio; and,
         Banks
                                                              (c) The increase in yields denoted by ∆Y.
         Let us start by first principles. Interest rate risk is most simply
         understood by looking at the (approximate) price equation
                                                              For example, a portfolio of size 1 trillion with 10 years of
         for a bond portfolio when there is a (small) change in the
                                                              duration, falls in value by 10 billion upon a 0.1% or 10 basis
         underlying interest rates, such as the level of government’s  points (bps) rise in the 10-year G-Sec benchmark yield.
         borrowing cost:
                       ∆P = – P X D X ∆Y, where
                                                              Let us consider each of these factors, in turn, in the present
          ∆ denotes change; P denotes the poftolio’s market value;  and historical Indian context.
          D denotes the “duration”, a neasure of the interest rate
                       sensitivity of the portfolio;          Size of the Portfolio
           and, Y denotes an underlying interest rate (or portfolio  The share of commercial banks in outstanding G-Secs is
                                yield).                       around 40% (June 2017). Investment of Scheduled
                                                              Commercial Banks (SCBs) in G-Secs as a percentage of their
         In other words, the value of the investment portfolio is a  total investment was around 82% for FY 2016-17. The
         function of three factors:                           corresponding figure for Public Sector Banks (PSBs) for FY
         (a) The size of the portfolio denoted by P ;         2016-17 is slightly higher at 84%. This exposure has
         (b) The duration denoted by D, which roughly captures the  noticeably increased since 2014 (Chart 3a).


             Chart 3a: Investment in Central Government securities as % of total investment



















                Chart 3b: Investment in Central Government securities as % of total assets



















         Source: Database on Indian Economy, RBI


            40 | 2018 | MARCH                                                              | BANKING FINANCE
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45