Page 24 - TEST_MONOGRAPH 2018_+cover_Float
P. 24

DEC Recommended Practices:  Enhancing ser-       lists for evaluating  clinical  performance: An inte-
                   vices for young children with disabilities and their   grative approach. Academic Medicine, 89(7), 996-
                   families (pp. 1-9). (DEC Recommended  Practices   1005. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000289
                   Monograph Series). Los Angeles: Division for Early   Schwartz, B. L. (2014). Memory: Foundations and ap-
                   Childhood.                                       plications (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
               Meige, A., & Schmitt, J. (2015). Innovation intelligence:   Serra, M. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2010). Metacomprehension
                   Commoditization, digitalization, acceleration, ma-  judgements reflect the belief that diagrams improve
                   jor pressure on innovation  drivers. Philadelphia:   learning from text. Memory, 7, 698-711. Retrieved
                   Absans Publishing.                               from  http://webpages.acs.ttu.edu/mserra/Serra%20
               Michie, S., Fixsen, D., Grimshaw, J. M., & Eccles, M.   Dunlosky%202010.pdf  doi:10.1080/09658211.201
                   P. (2009). Specifying  and reporting  complex  be-  0.506441
                   haviour change interventions: The need for a sci-  Shadish, W. R., & Haddock, C. K. (2009). Combining
                   entific  method.  Implementation  Science,  4(1), 40.   estimates of effect size. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges,
                   doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-40                       & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research
               Milbourne, S. A., & Campbell, P. H. (2007). Cara's kit:   synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 257-277).
                   Creating adaptations for routines and activities.   New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
                   Los Angeles, CA: Division for Early Childhood.  Simons, D. J. (2014).  The value of direct  replication.
               Milicevic,  M. (2015). Contemporary  education  and   Perspectives  on Psychological  Science,  9, 76-80.
                   digital technologies. International Journal of Social   doi:10.1177/1745691613514755
                   Science and Humanity, 5(7), 656-659. doi:10.7763/  Skeels, H., Updegraff, R., Wellman, B., & Williams, H.
                   IJSSH.2015.V5.535                                (1938). A study of environmental  stimulation: An
               Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or   orphanage  preschool  project.  University  of  Iowa
                   minus two: Some limits on our capacity for process-  Studies in Child Welfare, 15(4).
                   ing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.   Smith, B. J., Strain, P. S., Snyder, P., Sandall, S. R.,
                   doi:10.1037/h0043158                             McLean,  M.  E.,  Ramsey,  A.  B.,  &  Sumi,  W.  C.
               Mitzkat, A., Berger, S., Reeves, S., & Mahler, C. (2016).   (2002). DEC recommended practices: A review of
                   More terminological clarity in the interprofessional   9 years of EI/ECSE research literature. Journal of
                   field – a call for reflection on the use of terminolo-  Early Intervention, 25, 108-119.
                   gies, in both practice and research, on a national and   Snyder, P., & Ayankoya, B. (2015). Revisiting the Divi-
                   international level. GMS Journal of Medical Educa-  sion for Early Childhood recommended practices:
                   tion, 33(2). Retrieved  from https://www.ncbi.nlm.  When, who, and how. In Division for Early Child-
                   nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4895843/  doi:10.3205/   hood (Ed.), DEC recommended practices: Enhanc-
                   zma001035                                        ing services for young children with disabilities and
               Rabin, B. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2012). Developing the   their families (pp. 11-24). (DEC Recommended
                   terminology for dissemination and implementation   Practices Monograph Series, No. 1). Los Angeles:
                   research. In R. C. Brownson, G. A. Colditz, & E. K.   Division for Early Childhood.
                   Proctor (Eds.), Dissemination and implementation   Strain, P. S., Barton, E. E., & Dunlap, G. (2012). Les-
                   research in health (pp. 23-51). New York: Oxford   sons  learned about the utility of social validity.
                   University Press.                                Education and Treatment of Children, 35, 183-200.
               Rehman, S. (2016). Knowledge management: Challeng-   doi:10.1353/etc.2012.0007
                   es in curriculum design amid knowledge explosion.   Taub, D. E., & Greer, K. R. (2000). Physical activity as
                   In E. Grodzki & C. Calma (Eds.), Knowledge man-  a normalizing  experience  for school-age  children
                   agement and challenges in education (pp. 9-19).   with physical disabilities: Implications for legitima-
                   Krakow, Poland:  Scholars  Ink Publications  and   tion of social identity  and enhancement  of social
                   Jungo Press.                                     ties. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 24(4), 395-
               Sandall, S., McLean, M. E., & Smith, B. J. (Eds.). (2000).   414. doi:10.1177/0193723500244007
                   DEC recommended practices in early intervention/  Temmerman,  R. (2000).  Towards new ways of termi-
                   early childhood special education. Longmont, CO:   nology description: The sociocognitive-approach.
                   Sopris West.                                     Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
               Sanford, J. A. (2012).  Universal  design as a rehabili-  Thaiss, C., & Zawacki, T. M. (2006). Engaged writers
                   tation  strategy:  Design for the ages.  New York:   and dynamic disciplines: Research on the academic
                   Springer Publishing Company.                     writing life. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook.
               Schmutz, J., Eppich, W. J., Hoffmann, F., Heimberg, E.,   Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R.,
                   & Manser, T. (2014). Five steps to develop check-  Lubell, K., Stillman, L., . . . Saul, J. (2008). Bridg-




                                                             16
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29