Page 114 - Argentina - Carter, Regan, and Bush VP
P. 114

„ CONFIDENTIAL - GL»d                       -2-

                   We have also approved the licensing of 16 safety-related
                   munitions items from FMS, and are currently considering another
                   group of requests.

                   We have informed the Argentine government that if they reach
                   agreement on terms for a visit by the Inter-American Commission
                   on Human Rights, and there is no deterioration in the human
                   rights situation, we will go ahead with military training to
                   them and will recommend that the Export-Import Bank permit two
                   major credit sales.

                   The most pressing deadline is October 1, 1978, when the Kennedy-
                   Humphrey amendment prohibiting new arms transfers, and the Roybal
                   amendment, eliminating grant military training to Argentina, come
                   into effect. Both the Argentines and we are eager to take steps
                   which would permit the enormous back-log of credit to be com­
                   mitted before then. (There are over 75 pending FMS cases for
                   $50 million and $150 million on the munitions control lists.)
                   There are also funds for military training, which are being
                   held up, and which the President noted (on June 29) that he had
                   a "slight" inclination to find an excuse for approving.

                   Our current objectives are to urge the GOA: (1) to permit the
                   IAHRC to visit in accordance with the IAHRC's regulations;
                   (2) to begin releasing large numbers of prisoners (without re­
                   arresting them);  (3) to stop the disappearances and explain
                   those which have occurred; and (4) to seek a return to the rule
                   of law.
                   everything is stuck now pending Argentina's reaching agreement
                   with the Inter-American Commission or moving on one of the
                 ( other objectives above. This basic decision, made in accordance
                   with various legislative requirements, was made by State without
                   consulting NSC.
                                                                                                     --------
                   III. Future U.S. Policy: Who Blinks at the Brink?

                   Have we gone too far? Have we pushed our policy beyond its
                   effectiveness? Are we pushing the Argentines over the edge and
                   jeopardizing our future relationship? Does the terror justify
                   the repression?

                   The last question is definitely the easiest. First of all.
                   President Videla told our Ambassador in April 1978 that the
                   war against subversion in Argentina had ended and that he was
                   working to restore the rule of law. Terrorism has not left
                   Argentina, but it is now the exception, not the rule. And
                   Videla, himself, admits that the war is over; we are just
                   encouraging that he secure his own promise. But regardless,
                   a central tenet of our human rights policy is that government-
                   sanctioned repression never solves terrorism. As Vance said in
                   his' OAS speech last year, "The surest way to defeat terrorism
                   is to promote justice. . . Justice that is summary undermines
                   the future it seeks to promote. It produces only more’
                   violence..."

                 --CQNFIDENT-IAi—- GDS
   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119