Page 376 - Leadership in the Indian Army
P. 376

perturbed  by  this  reaction,  since  he  knew  the  reason  from  which  it
                stemmed, and did not hold it against the concerned officers.
                   Hanut’s last assignment was as the Commandant of the Armoured Corps

                Centre and School at Ahmednagar, where he moved in July 1988. It was
                expected that he would be made an Army Commander, but this was not to
                be. By now, General Sundarji had retired and General V.N. Sharma, who
                was  also  from  the  Armoured  Corps,  had  taken  over  as  COAS.  With  a
                faultless  service  record,  there  was  no  reason  for  Hanut  to  be  considered
                unsuitable  for  commanding  a  field  army.  Yet  he  was.  There  were  two
                reasons put forward for this. The first, that he was a bachelor and shunned

                social life, was valid, but the second, concerning his religious beliefs, was
                not. He was branded a ‘religious bigot’, a charge that was blatantly untrue
                and  unfair.  Though  he  was  a  deeply  religious  man,  Hanut  could  by  no
                stretch  of  the  imagination  be  called  a  bigot.  He  was  extremely  broad-
                minded and never interfered with those practising other religions. The fact
                that troops of all religious denominations literally worshipped him, should

                have been enough to give the lie to this insinuation made by one of his own
                ilk.
                   When a suboridinate informed Hanut of his having been passed over, and
                expressed his sorrow, his reply was typical. ‘Why should you be sorry? It is
                the army which should be sorry. If they don’t want me, the loss is theirs.’
                Not  many  officers  in  uniform  would  take  their  supersession  so
                philosophically.  Hanut  knew  it  was  not  a  reflection  on  his  professional

                competence, and felt no need to represent against it. He continued to do his
                job with the same dedication and loyalty till he retired on 31 July 1991.
                   In the final analysis, Hanut would like to be remembered as a ‘soldier’s
                General’.  He  always  felt,  and  told  other  officers:  ‘We  as  officers  do  not
                deserve the men we command. We do so little for them, and they give us so
                much  more  in  return.’  Wherever  he  went,  he  tried  to  ameliorate  and

                improve the working and living conditions of the common soldier. Often, a
                JCO, NCO or jawan would walk up to him and introduce himself, saying:
                ‘You will not remember me, but I was serving in so and so unit under your
                command.  I  heard  that  you  were  around,  and  came  to  pay  my  respects.’
                (The  word  they  usually  used  was  ‘  darshan  ’,  which  really  has  no
                equivalent in the English language.) In fact, one of Hanut’s most treasured
                memories is of the soldier who walked upto his driver and asked him: ‘ Yeh

                wohi  general  sahib  hain  jo  ki  jawanon  ka  itna  khayal  rakha  karte  the?
   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381