Page 308 - The Social Animal
P. 308

290 The Social Animal


           how should we proceed? It is tempting to search for simple solu-
           tions. In the early 1970s, no less an expert than a former president
           of the American Psychological Association suggested that we de-
           velop an anticruelty drug to be fed to people (especially national
                                                                  98
           leaders) as a way of reducing violence on a universal scale. The
           quest for such a solution is understandable and even somewhat
           touching, but it is extremely unlikely that a drug could be devel-
           oped that would reduce cruelty without completely tranquilizing
           the motivational systems of its users. Chemicals cannot make the
           fine distinctions that psychological processes can. Gentle, peace-
           loving people (like Albert Einstein) who are also energetic, cre-
           ative, courageous, and resourceful are produced by a subtle
           combination of physiological and psychological forces, of inherited
           capacities and learned values. It is difficult to conceive of a chem-
           ical that could perform as subtly. Moreover, chemical control of
           human behavior has the quality of an Orwellian nightmare. Whom
           could we trust to use such methods?
               There are probably no simple, foolproof solutions. But let’s spec-
           ulate about some complex and less foolproof possibilities based upon
           what we’ve learned so far.

           Pure Reason I am certain we could construct a logical, reasonable
           set of arguments depicting the dangers of aggression and the misery
           produced (not only in victims but also in aggressors) by aggressive
           acts. I’m even fairly certain we could convince most people that the
           arguments were sound; clearly, most people would agree that war is
           hell and violence in the streets is undesirable. But such arguments,
           no matter how sound, no matter how convincing, probably would
           not significantly curtail aggressive behavior. Even if convinced that
           aggression, in general, is undesirable, individuals will behave aggres-
           sively unless they firmly believe aggression is undesirable for them.
           As Aristotle observed more than 2,000 years ago, many people can-
           not be persuaded by rational behavior: “For argument based on
           knowledge implies instruction, and there are people whom one can-
                       99
           not instruct.” Moreover, because the problem of the control of ag-
           gression is one that first occurs in early childhood—that is, at a time
           when the individual is too young to be reasoned with—logical argu-
           ments are of little value. For these reasons, social psychologists have
           searched for alternative techniques of persuasion. Many of these have
   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313