Page 305 - The Social Animal
P. 305

Human Aggression 287


           believe that repeated exposure to X-rated “slasher” films—which are
           extremely violent but less sexually explicit than pornographic films—
           has more damaging effects than nonviolent X-rated films. In one
                96
           study, Daniel Linz and his colleagues found desensitization effects
           after exposing male students to as few as two slasher films spaced two
           days apart. That is, when their reactions to the first and second films
           were compared, the men showed a reduced emotional response to the
           violent content of the film and found the treatment of the women in
           the film less degrading. In addition, the researchers compared the ef-
           fects of X-rated slasher movies, X-rated soft-porn movies, and teen-
           sex movies on men’s attitudes toward rape victims. Two days after
           watching the films, the students participated in a supposedly unre-
           lated study in which they viewed a reenactment of a rape trial and
           were asked to make judgments about the victim and defendant. Once
           again, the slasher films had a powerful impact on the attitudes of male
           viewers. Compared with those who watched the nonviolent pornog-
           raphy or teen-sex films, men exposed to the slasher films expressed
           less sympathy for the rape victim in the trial, as well as less empathy
           for rape victims in general. These findings suggest that our society’s
           rating system for movies is off-target and misleading: Sexually explicit
           but nonviolent films are given more restrictive X ratings, while graph-
           ically violent slasher movies earn only an R rating—and thus are more
           widely seen—despite evidence of their negative impact.
               To sum up, the combination of sex and violence—whether in
           pornographic films or slasher films—has effects remarkably similar
           to those associated with other violence in the media: The level of ag-
           gression is increased and, in many instances, attitudes condoning vi-
           olence are strengthened. Viewing violence (pornographic or
           otherwise) does not serve a cathartic function but seems, rather, to
           stimulate aggressive behavior. These data raise complex policy issues
           involving censorship and First Amendment rights that extend be-
           yond the scope of this book. Although I personally am opposed to
           the imposition of censorship, I would think that an impartial read-
           ing of the research would lead those decision makers within the
           media to exercise some prudent self-restraint.

           Does Violence Sell? As we noted earlier in this chapter, some 58
           percent of all TV shows contain acts of violence. The reason for this
           is obvious: TV producers and advertising agencies believe that
   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310