Page 368 - The Social Animal
P. 368

350 The Social Animal


           first few days, most of them tried to compete against each other—
           even though competitiveness was dysfunctional. Let me illustrate
           with an actual example, typical of the way the children stumbled
           toward the learning of the cooperative process. In one of our groups
           there was a Mexican-American boy, whom I will call Carlos. Car-
           los’s task was to report on Joseph Pulitzer’s young manhood. He
           knew the material, but he was very nervous and was having a very
           hard time. During the past few weeks, some of the Anglo students
           had taunted him about his accent, and he was afraid that this might
           happen again.
               He stammered, hesitated, and fidgeted. Sure enough, the other
           kids in the circle were not very helpful. They were well versed in the
           rough-and-tumble tactics of the competitive classroom. They knew
           what to do when a kid stumbled—especially a kid whom they be-
           lieved to be stupid. They ridiculed him. During our experiment, it
           was Mary who was observed to say: “Aw, you don’t know it, you’re
           dumb, you’re stupid. You don’t know what you’re doing.” In our ini-
           tial experiment, the groups were being loosely monitored by a re-
           search assistant who was floating from group to group. When this
           incident occurred, our assistant made one brief intervention: “Okay,
           you can do that if you want to. It might even be fun for you. But it’s
           not going to help you learn about Joseph Pulitzer’s young adulthood.
           By the way, the exam will take place in less than an hour.” Notice
           how the reinforcement contingencies had shifted. No longer did
           Mary gain much from rattling Carlos; in fact, she now stood to lose
           a great deal.
               After a few similar experiences, it dawned on the students in
           Carlos’s group that the only way they could learn about the segment
           Carlos was trying to teach them was by paying attention to what
           Carlos had to say. Gradually, they began to develop into good lis-
           teners. Some even became pretty good interviewers. Instead of ig-
           noring or ridiculing Carlos when he was having a little trouble
           communicating what he knew, they began asking gentle, probing
           questions—the kinds of questions that made it easier for Carlos to
           communicate what was in his mind. Carlos began to respond to this
           treatment by becoming more relaxed; with increased relaxation
           came an improvement in his ability to communicate. After a couple
           of weeks, the other children realized that Carlos was a lot smarter
           than they had thought he was. Because they were paying attention,
   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373