Page 370 - The Social Animal
P. 370

352 The Social Animal


           Underlying Mechanisms Why does the jigsaw method pro-
           duce such positive results? One reason for its effectiveness is that this
           cooperative strategy places people in a favor-doing situation.That is,
           each individual in a group, by sharing his or her knowledge with the
           other members, is doing them a favor. You will recall that, in Chap-
           ter 5, we discussed an experiment by Mike Leippe and Donna Eisen-
           stadt 101  that demonstrated that people who acted in a way that
           benefited others subsequently came to feel more favorably toward the
           people they helped.
               A different but complementary mechanism was illustrated in an
           experiment by Samuel Gaertner and his colleagues,  102  demonstrat-
           ing that what seems to happen is that the process of cooperation low-
           ers barriers between groups by changing the cognitive categories
           people use. In other words, cooperation changes our tendency to cat-
           egorize the outgroup from “those people” to “us people.” But how
           does this change from “those people” to “us people” actually come
           about? I believe that the mediating process is empathy—the ability
           to experience what your group member is experiencing. In the com-
           petitive classroom, the primary goal is simply to show the teacher
           how smart you are. You don’t have to pay much attention to the other
           students. But the jigsaw situation is different. To participate effec-
           tively in the jigsaw classroom, each student needs to pay close atten-
           tion to whichever member of the group is reciting. In the process, the
           participants begin to learn that great results can accrue if each of
           their classmates is approached in a way that is tailored to fit his or
           her special needs. For example, Alice may learn that Carlos is a bit
           shy and needs to be prodded gently, while Phyllis is so talkative that
           she might need to be reigned in occasionally. Peter can be joked with,
           while Serena responds only to serious suggestions.
               If our analysis is sound, then it should follow that working in jig-
           saw groups would lead to the sharpening of a youngster’s general em-
           pathic ability. To test this notion, Diane Bridgeman 103  conducted a
           clever experiment with 10-year-old children. Prior to her experi-
           ment, half the children had spent two months participating in jigsaw
           classes; the others spent that time in traditional classrooms. In her
           experiment, Bridgeman showed the children a series of cartoons
           aimed at testing a child’s ability to empathize—to put themselves in
           the shoes of the cartoon characters. For example, in one cartoon, the
           first panel shows a little boy looking sad as he waves good-bye to his
   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375