Page 463 - The Social Animal

Chapter 3 445

25. Petty, R. E., & Cacciopo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion.
In L. Berkowitz (Eds.) Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 123–205). Hills-
dale, NJ: Erlbaum.
See also: Petty, R. E., Heesacker, M., & Hughes, J. N. (1997). The elaboration like-
lihood model: Implications for the practice of school psychology. Journal of School Psy-
chology, 35(2), 107–136.
See also: Chaiken, S., Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (1996). Principles of persuasion. In
E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles
(pp. 702–742). New York: Guilford Press.
26. McGlone, M.S., & Tofighbakhsh, J. (2000). Birds of a feather flock conjointly (?):
Rhyme as reason in aphorisms. Psychological Science, 11, 424 –428.
27. Luntz, F. (2007). Words that work. New York: Hyperion.

28. Aristotle. (1954). Rhetoric. In W. Roberts (Trans.), Aristotle, rhetoric and poetics (p. 25).
New York: Modern Library.
29. Hovland, C., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communica-
tion effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635–650.
30. Aronson, E., & Golden, B. (1962). The effect of relevant and irrelevant aspects of
communicator credibility on opinion change. Journal of Personality, 30, 135–146.
31. Walster (Hatfield), E., Aronson, E., & Abrahams, D. (1966). On increasing the per-
suasiveness of a low-prestige communicator. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2,
325–342.
32. Eagly, A., Wood, W., & Chaiken, S. (1978). Causal inferences about communicators
and their effect on opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36,
424–435.
33. Santa Cruz Sentinel, January 13, 1987, p. A8.

34. Walster (Hatfield), E., & Festinger, L. (1962). The effectiveness of “overheard” persua-
sive communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 395–402.
35. Mills, J., & Aronson, E. (1965). Opinion change as a function of communicator’s at-
tractiveness and desire to influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1,
173–177.
36. Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1975). An attribution analysis of the effect of communicator
characteristics on opinion change: The case of communicator attractiveness. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 136–144.
Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is
beautiful is good, but . . . : A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attrac-
tiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 109–128.
37. Hartmann, G. (1936). A field experience on the comparative effectiveness of “emo-
tional” and “rational” political leaflets in determining election results. Journal of Abnor-
mal and Social Psychology, 31, 336–352.
38. Leventhal, H. (1970). Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. In L.
Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 119–186). New
York: Academic Press.