Page 499 - The Social Animal

Chapter 8 481

16. Lott, B., & Lott, A. (1960). The formation of positive attitudes toward group mem-
bers. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 297–300.
17. Brehm, J., & Cole, A. (1966). Effect of a favor which reduces freedom. Journal of Per-
sonality and Social Psychology, 3, 420–426.

18. Tolstoy, L. (1942). War and peace. New York: Simon & Schuster.
19. Bigelow, J. (Ed.). (1916). The autobiography of Benjamin Franklin (pp. 216–217). New
York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
20. Jecker, J., & Landy, D. (1969). Liking a person as a function of doing him a favor.
Human Relations, 22, 371–378.
21. Lerner, M., & Simmons, C. (1966). Observer’s reaction to the “innocent victim”: Com-
passion or rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203–210.
22. Lott, A. J., Lott, B. E., Reed, T., & Crow, T. (1960). Personality-trait descriptions of
differentially liked persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 284–290.
23. Bales, R. (1958). Task roles and social roles in problem solving groups. In E. E. Mac-
coby, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (3rd ed., pp.
437–447). New York: Holt.
Bales, R., & Slater, P. (1955). Role differentiation in small decision-making groups.
In T. Parsons & R. F. Bales (Eds.), The family, socialization, and interaction process. Glen-
coe, IL: Free Press.
24. Aronson, E., Willerman, B., & Floyd, J. (1966). The effect of a pratfall on increasing
interpersonal attractiveness. Psychonomic Science, 4, 227–228.
25. Deaux, K. (1972). To err is humanizing: But sex makes a difference. Representative Re-
search in Social Psychology, 3, 20–28.
26. Aronson, E., Helmreich, R., & LeFan, J. (1970).To err is humanizing—sometimes: Ef-
fects of self-esteem, competence, and a pratfall on interpersonal attraction. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 259–264.
27. Tesser, A., & Brodie, M. (1971). A note on the evaluation of a “computer date.” Psy-
chonomic Science, 23, 300.
28. Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on roman-
tic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 59, 981–993.
29. Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. Importance of physical attrac-
tiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 508–516.
30. White, G. (1980). Physical attractiveness and courtship progress. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 39, 660–668.
31. Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster (Hatfield), E. (1972). What is beautiful is good.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290.
32. Ramsey-Rennels, J. L., & Langlois, J. H. (2006). Infants’ differential processing of fe-
male and male faces. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 59–62.
33. Tan, A. S. (1979). TV beauty ads and role expectations of adolescent female viewers.
Journalism Quarterly, 56, 283–288.