Page 24 - C.Journal 4th edition
P. 24

Claims Journal 4th Edition                                                                                                                                                          Claims Journal 4th Edition

            Claims channel                                                                                                         Claims channel







                                                                                                                                    Level 2 Technical Audit process
                                       Technical Updates                                                                             Inception date: March 2017



                                                                                                                                     Objectives:
                                                                                                                                     •  To increase production with high percentage of quality.
            Improvements-New process                                                                                                 •  To revalidate Technical shortfalls if valid or not.

            Level 2 Recon process- Weekly quality checking                                                                           •  To highlight issues to providers to decrease or eliminate repetitive technical errors.

                                                                                                                                     Scope:
            Inception date: Nov 2016                                                                                                 •  Top 20 providers
                                                                                                                                     •   Dental and Optical Batches
            Objectives:                                                                                                              •   Statements with high SF % and zero approved
            To re-validate difference in computation reasons, claims not received and Invalid memberships.
            To Identify typo errors in the batch headers and double check the figures.                                               •  Issues to be double checked:

                                                                                                                                     •  Invalid service codes
            How it is done:                                                                                                          •  Late submission of claims
            A team leader is assigned per week to do the revalidation of every batch done by recon team.                             •  No PA claims
                                                                                                                                     •  Tooth number not attached
                                                                                                                                     •  Duplicate services
            Sample Monitoring Sheet                                                                                                  •  Invalid benefit type/ head
                                                                                                                                     •  Attached BME card is not valid
                                                                                                                                     •  Rejected referral batches

                                                                                                                                    How it is done:
                                                                                                                                    Top 20 providers, dental and optical batches,   statements with high SF % and zero approved will
                                                                                                                                    be re-assigned again for technical audit to tech quality team.

























                                                                                                                                                                                                 Provided by :

                                                                                                                                                                                             Reginald King Sorra




          24                                                                                                                                                                                                                        25
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29