Page 138 - Bundle for MF Final
P. 138

Bates no   137







                                                               APPLICATION FOR ASSISTANCE OF A M KENZIE FRIEND
                                                                                          c
                                                                     PART 5:CHRONOLOGV OF INSURANCE CLAIMS
                                     TH
                     5.14  LPJS WILL 2ND NOVEMBER 2016
                     76. LPJS updated her will on 2nd November 2016  (see paragraph 188) which made it clear
                         that the Claimant:

                            •  had no financial stake in Nutley Place and that LPJS's 100% interest would pass to
                               her children on her death;
                            •  could remain rent free as a tenant for a maximum of four years - following her
                               death - providing he looked after her two youngest children;

                            •  would be required to move out - without compensation - when they attained the
                               age of 18 years:

                            •  or to move out immediately if he began to cohabit with a new partner

                         LP JS and the Claimant discussed 55  her will and he raised no objections to it 56 •  LP JS felt
                         that she was being  "a bit hard"  but told the Claimant  that  "this is the way it has got to
                         be .....  its my only asset and it has to pass to the kids'.


                     77. The Claimant has recently denied that he read the will or discussed it.  but it is clear that he
                         did  (see paragraph 189) and acted on  LPJS's referral to Core Law to prepare  his own  will.

                                                 5r
                     5.15  TRANSFER OF £500,000:  2l DECEMBER 2016
                              st
                     78. On 21 December 2016 the Claimant made a voluntary and spontaneous deposit of
                         £500.000 into the mortgage account of "APM and LPJ Siggers" with Barclays-Woolwich.
                         At the time, LPJS hoped it was a genuine and generous gift from funds honestly acquired
                                                                       57
                         and which the Claimant had already stated was "ours" •
                      79. The Claimant made the deposit through an unnecessarily convoluted process  (Attachment
                         2) whose primary objectives appear be to:

                             •  remove the £500,000 from all accounts in his name and to disassociate himself
                                from it, possibly in anticipation of being asked to make a declaration, by
                                Diamond  Insurance, of all compensation received 58 ;

                             •  prevent it being discovered by Diamond Insurance [which he was worried might
                                retain investigators];

                             •  avoid or delay the need to declare it on his January 2017 tax return;

                             •  reduce LPJS's monthly interest payments by approximately £1,000 59 ;

                             •  make sure the money could not be touched until the entire mortgage was
                                redeemed;



                     55 Which he read
                     56  But for possibly for a far more sinister reaction
                      7
                     5 See paragraph  73
                     58  Most likely at the Joint Settlement Meeting
                     59  To date,  the Claimant has not asked for the recovery of around £30,000 in saved interest
                                                        14  I  Page
   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143