Page 90 - Bundle for MF Final

Bates no 089

Michael.Comer@btconnect.com

From: Michael.Comer@btconnect.com
Sent: 21 August 2018 03:42
To: 'Siggers, Louise (lsiggers@gmail.com)'
Cc: 'Jean Comer'
Subject: FW: Nutley Place
Attachments: Loan agreement Louise.docx; Nutley Place.docx; Purchased items for Nutley
Place.docx; Sigve's claim rev3.pdf

Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

Dear Lou,

The email below came overnight (22.21)

My schedule as a pdf is attached Sigve's claim rev 3

I would like to respond to him as follows:

Dear Sig,

There are a couple of corrections I must make to your email.

Firstly, I never said that the timing of your separation from Louise did not benefit "any of us". In fact, when
you dropped the bomb in my lap I made it very clear that I believed the timing was overwhelmingly in your
favour and could be construed as abandonment as a direct result of Anthony's financial support for your
life-style being reduced.

You cannot have forgotten my disappointment (with you) that you sat through Lou's recent court cases,
never once correcting your assurances that your relationship with her was sound and that your long term
plans were to stay together were firm. Five weeks after Anthony's obligations were reduced you took the
decision you did. I cannot accept the two developments were unrelated. I told you I would never forgive
you for remaining silent. If you had announced your decision to scamper off before the final hearing, Lou
would still be in receipt of maint�nance from Anthony.

I told you that although you may not have a legal obligation to support Lou, your moral duty was
clear. You repeatedly pointed out the work you had done on the house and costs you had incurred, blah,
blah. I suggested that this merely offset the minimal contribution you had made (over 8-9 years) towards
living costs in a very expensive house. You said you understood this and would do all you could to help. It
seems you have had second thoughts.

Secondly, Lou does not accept that your clothes were thrown on the drive. They were carefully packed ,
secure and clean, ready for your collection. The reason you were banned from the house was because on a
previous occasion you had turned up unannounced and forced your way in when only he kids were
present. You had no right of entry and I believe Tom said he would call the police if you did not leave.

I will review your schedules (with which I do not agree) but please provide me with:

• Details of any written loan agreements you had with Lou;
• The evidence on which you separated "gifts" from the costs and loans you hope to claim against
equity in the house;

1