Page 20 - Election Fraud in Korea-ENG-KOR
P. 20

Huawei brand associated with the Chinese Tencent Company, suspicions were raised that
               the Chinese Communist Party may have involved in the election.

                    Numerous  civil  society  organizations  issued  declarations  and  statements  requesting
               official investigations for election fraud. For example, the Professors’ Solidarity for Freedom
               & Justice of Korea having a membership of 6,300 full-time professors in South Korea issued
               the following official statement jointly with several civil society groups:


                 < The Democracy Manifesto for Fair Election> May 26, 2020, Professors' Solidarity for
                 Freedom & Justice of Korea

                 We, the people, demand cooperation for a thorough investigation of the alleged frauds in
                 the  April  15th  National  Assembly  Election  and  punishment  of  the  ringleaders.  We  are
                 ordinary citizens, students, housewives, office workers, and professors of the Republic of
                 Korea. A number of Koreans and intellectuals from abroad are also joining us here today.
                 Now, the 21st National Assembly Election has passed the stage of suspicion of fraud, and
                 only the process of revealing the actual truth remains. We are persistently speaking about
                 this issue because reasonable suspicions have been raised strongly and concretely that the
                 results of the people's sovereign rights were fundamentally distorted and the results of the
                 vote count were manipulated by certain individuals or power. The evidence is as follows.

                   First, the statistical results derived from the April 15th election were unnaturally uniform
                 and regular, and that is paradoxical and highly questionable. With regard to early voting,
                 the number of early votes outside electoral districts divided by the total number of the early
                 votes  was  nearly  identical  for  each  candidate  from  both  Party  No.1  and  Party  No.  2.
                 Furthermore, in numerous electoral districts, the number of early votes was consistently
                 about  10%  higher  than  regular  votes  for  Party  No.1  whereas  that  of  Party  No.2  was
                 consistently lower by 10%. There were even cases where the number of votes was higher
                 than the number of electors, in several districts. Therefore, in and outside of the country,
                 numerous experts in Statistics and Mathematics have analyzed the data of this election and
                 further confirmed that such statistical results cannot occur naturally.
                   Second, it was caught multiple times across the country how blank ballots were placed
                 into the box for the candidates of the Party No.1, and these early voting papers, that should
                 have  been  printer-printed  and  defined  in  size  and  format,  were  irregularly  cut  off  and
                 margins  were  not  the  same  as  the  normal  ones  that  meet  the  standard  specifications.
                 Besides, there were multiple events where two ballots were stuck together as if they were
                 guillotined wrongly, and it ignited further suspicions when heaps of crisp, unfolded ballots
                 were poured out from a single ballot box during the vote-counting process.

                   Third, the “seals” that should have been “sealing” the ballot box seals were taken off or
                 damaged. Dozens of such seals were found in the waste dump at the waste disposal plant.
                 Additionally, the signatures on the seals, which should have been signed by the assigned
                 election  observers  in  advance,  were  found  to  be  different  from  his  or  her  original
                 handwriting and it was even captured that such signing on the ballot seal was taking place
                 not at the designated polling station, but at the warehouse run by the National Election
                 Commission.
                   Fourth, the National Election Commission had explained that ‘since the ballot sorting
                 machines operate offline, there is absolutely no connection to the outside’. However, this
                 was proven to be false and in fact the wireless connection was available for these machines.
                 This  was  revealed  by  a  courageous  individual  who  claims  to  be  a  whistleblower  and
                 explained publicly and in detail, how to connect these machines to the external network.
                 Besides,  the  sorting  machines  turned  out  to  also  have  connection  ports  for  cable
                 connections. Moreover, it was also discovered that there were electronic parts inside the
                 ballot  sorting  machine  that  could  be  programmed  to  manipulate  the  ballot  counting  as





                                                           - 14-
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25