Page 131 - Trilateral Korea Japan U.S. Cooperation
P. 131

Beginning in 1958, Kim Il-Sung began a campaign to have
            Koreans living in Japan immigrate to North Korea. He widely
            advertised North Korea as a “paradise on earth” and used the
            Japanese organization under his influence, the Federation of
            Korean Industries, to gather people who wanted to return to
            North Korea. He demanded that the Japanese government
            establish a system for their immigration to North Korea.
            As a result, the Japanese government promoted the Korean
            Peninsula as a place to live. It promoted the return of Koreans
            living in Japan to North Korea. As part of this effort, the
            Japanese Red Cross Society and the North Korean Red Cross
            Society signed an agreement on return operations, which
            began in December 1959, to emigrate those who wished to
            live in North Korea. This program continued until July 1984.
            From the 600,000 or so Koreans living in Japan, roughly
            93,000 emigrated to North Korea, which they believed was
            “paradise on earth.” As a result, most Korean families living in
            Japan had relatives in North Korea.


            In truth, their loved ones were taken hostage by the North
            Korean government. The 93,000 people who emigrated to
            North Korea as a result of this project were plunged into a life
            without living supplies or human rights, and those who tried
            to improve their lives or escape from North Korea became
            victims of enforced disappearance.


            In a court case brought against the North Korean government
            by those who fled North Korea and returned to Japan, the
            Tokyo High Court ruled in a written decision as follows:


            “The Government of North Korea, in the course of its Return



        130  Section II : Human Rights, Abductees, Forced Repatriation of Refugees and the Regional Implications
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136