Page 417 - Gerakan-gerakan Agraria Transnasional

Perdagangan dan Bioteknologi di Amerika Latin

Icaza, R., 2004. Civil Society and Regionalisation. Explor-
ing the Contours of Mexican Transnational Activism.
CSGR Working Paper No. 150/04, Warwick Univer-
sity.
James, C., 2006. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/
RG Crops. ISAAA Briefs No. 35. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA.
Jansen, K. and S. Vellema, eds, 2004. Agribusiness and
Society: Corporate Responses to Environmentalism,
Market Opportunities and Public Regulation. London:
Zed Books.
Kay, C., 2002. ‘Chile’s Neo-Liberal Agrarian Transforma-
tion and the Peasantry’. Journal of Agrarian Change,
2 (4): 464–501.
Keck, M. and K. Sikkink, 1998. Activists Beyond Borders:
Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca,
NY: Cornell University Press.
Kenfield, I. and R. Burbach, 2007. ‘Landless Rural Worker
Shot by Security Company Hired by Multinational
Syngenta’. Posted on the ‘Brazil Network’ list serve,
21 October 2007.
Kossoy, A., 2003. ‘Iniciativas de Asociaciones de
Productores Agropecuarios: La Incorporación de la
Soja en la Emergencia Alimentaria’. In Respuestas de
la Sociedad Civil ala Emergencia Social, eds I.
González Bombal, 89–119. Buenos Aires: CEDES.
Levidow, L., 1998. ‘Democratizing Technology or
Technologizing Democracy? Regulating Agricultural
Biotechnology in Europe’. Technology in Society, 20
(2): 211–26.
Lipton, M., 2001. ‘Reviving Global Poverty Reduction:
What Role for Genetically Modified Plants?’. Journal
of International Development, 13 (7): 823–46.
McAdam, D., S. Tarrow and C. Tilly, 2003. ‘Dynamics of
Contention’. Social Movement Studies, 2 (1): 99–102.

403