Page 12 - MSBs rapport
P. 12
FiP – Ett kostnadseffektivt hjälpmedel för ett likvärdigt skydd mot olyckor? Lantz
11.3.2 Skärsläckare ...................................................................................................................... 59
11.3.3 Brandsläckningsgranat ................................................................................................... 59
11.3.4 PPV .................................................................................................................................... 60
11.4 Larmställ ..................................................................................................................... 60
11.5 Övrigt ........................................................................................................................... 60
11.6 Sammanfattning av åtgärdsförslag ......................................................................... 61
12. Diskussion ....................................................................................................................... 62
12.1 FiP – En lönsam verksamhet .................................................................................... 62
12.2 Intervjuundersökningen ........................................................................................... 63
12.3 Tidskillnader .............................................................................................................. 63
12.4 Kostnads-nyttoanalys ................................................................................................ 64
13. Slutsats ............................................................................................................................. 66
14. Källförteckning ............................................................................................................... 67
Bilaga A – Intervjuenkät ..................................................................................................... 69
Bilaga B – Intervjuresultat .................................................................................................. 73
Bilaga C – Övningsunderlag .............................................................................................. 77
Bilaga D – Respondenternas svar ...................................................................................... 78
D.1 Sydöstra Skånes Räddningstjänstförbund ....................................................................... 78
D.2 Falkenbergs Räddningstjänst ............................................................................................. 79
D.3 Leksands Räddningstjänst ................................................................................................. 79
D.4 Jönköpings Räddningstjänst .............................................................................................. 80
Bilaga E – Känslighetsanalys ............................................................................................. 82
XII
11.3.2 Skärsläckare ...................................................................................................................... 59
11.3.3 Brandsläckningsgranat ................................................................................................... 59
11.3.4 PPV .................................................................................................................................... 60
11.4 Larmställ ..................................................................................................................... 60
11.5 Övrigt ........................................................................................................................... 60
11.6 Sammanfattning av åtgärdsförslag ......................................................................... 61
12. Diskussion ....................................................................................................................... 62
12.1 FiP – En lönsam verksamhet .................................................................................... 62
12.2 Intervjuundersökningen ........................................................................................... 63
12.3 Tidskillnader .............................................................................................................. 63
12.4 Kostnads-nyttoanalys ................................................................................................ 64
13. Slutsats ............................................................................................................................. 66
14. Källförteckning ............................................................................................................... 67
Bilaga A – Intervjuenkät ..................................................................................................... 69
Bilaga B – Intervjuresultat .................................................................................................. 73
Bilaga C – Övningsunderlag .............................................................................................. 77
Bilaga D – Respondenternas svar ...................................................................................... 78
D.1 Sydöstra Skånes Räddningstjänstförbund ....................................................................... 78
D.2 Falkenbergs Räddningstjänst ............................................................................................. 79
D.3 Leksands Räddningstjänst ................................................................................................. 79
D.4 Jönköpings Räddningstjänst .............................................................................................. 80
Bilaga E – Känslighetsanalys ............................................................................................. 82
XII
