Page 202 - Constructing Craft
P. 202

not detached in the worker’s mind from the product being made; the worker was

               free to control their own working action; the worker was able to learn from their work
               and to use and develop their skills and capacities undertaking a task; there was no

               split between work and play, or work and culture; and the worker’s livelihood
                                                                     17
               determined and infused their entire mode of living.  The author of the report, Dr
               Kerr Inkson, although identifying the contrast between ‘home craft work’ and ‘factory
               work’ in explaining how potters controlled their work, noted that ‘craft work is still

               embedded in economic institutions which may affect it through their own

                           18
               dynamics.’  Inkson selected studio potters because he believed being a
               craftsperson involved a complete integration of work, learning and living and, as

               previously stated, potters were the most economically integrated of all craftspeople.

               Many craftspeople agreed with him and for some this aspect of craft was as
               important, if not more important, than the objects they created.




               Thinking about Work


               A number of philosophers have considered the role of craft as work in Western

               society. For instance, both Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Karl Marx believed that
                                                            19
               craft was the most satisfying form of work.  Another, the Austrian philosopher Ivan
               Illich, like Bourdieu, believed that attitudes to work were established and reinforced
               by mass education. He was also convinced that craft had suffered because of this.

               He concluded that mass education had conditioned people to accept industrial

               working conditions as natural. Moreover, like Bourdieu, he believed that planning,
               standardisation and the control of occupations through the awarding of formal

               qualifications and licensing of ‘professionals’ were forms of control demanded by
               the education system.



                        Work is productive, respectable, worthy of the citizen only when
                        the work process is planned, monitored, and controlled by the
                        professional  agent,  who  insures  that  the  work  meets  certified
                        need in a standardised fashion. … The infrastructure of society
                        is  so  arranged  that  only  the  job  gives  access  to  the  tools  of
                        production,  and  this  monopoly  of  commodity  production  over
                        the generation of use-values turns even more stringent as the
                        state takes over. Only with a licence may you teach a child; only
                        at  a  clinic  may  you  set  a  bone.  Housework,  handicrafts,


                                                                          Constructing Craft
   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207