Page 253 - Constructing Craft
P. 253

Feminist Ideology

               Resistance to the supremacy of a dominant group by women was not based on a

               single ideology. There existed three forms of feminist opposition. Radical-feminists
               argued that there were psychological and biological differences between the sexes

               and therefore women’s art was substantially different from men’s art. Women’s work
               attempted to elevate women’s concerns – pregnancy, motherhood and domesticity

               – often through techniques and materials traditionally associated with women –

               embroidery and quilting for example. Radical-feminists rejected aesthetic standards
               defined by males. An example of this form of opposition was the resistance by the

               New Zealand Spinning, Weaving and Woolcrafts Society and the New Zealand

               Embroiderers Guilds to joining the New Zealand Chapter of the World Craft Council
               in the late-1970s. The members of these organisations were predominantly women,

               and although the majority of them would not have regarded themselves as radical-
               feminists, they were reluctant to have their work judged by others (i.e. men). At the

               individual level, Juliet Batten was a radical-feminist artist who incorporated ideas
                                                                       23
               about ‘nurturing [and] sexuality’ in her work in fabric.  Socialist-feminists, on the
               other hand, studied the oppression of women across wider fields, which included

               social, cultural and historical concerns about how and where art or craft work was
               produced. The socialist-feminist approach questioned the very definition of art,

               therefore the art/craft debate was placed at the forefront of their discussion. They
               were also interested in highlighting measurable inequalities. For instance, they

               knew that Queen Elizabeth II Arts Council grants clearly favoured male artists over
               female and explained that situation on the conditioning of women. Socialist-feminist

               believed that many women, particularly craftswomen, may have been reluctant to

               apply for grants because their conditioning convinced them that their work was
               inferior. Another reason was the wish to avoid the bureaucratic intrusion grant

               applications would have subjected them to. Finally, liberal-feminists were largely

               concerned with the lack of access and opportunities for women but were less
               interested in dismantling existing ideological and political structures. They wished to

               extend to women the same rights that men enjoyed. Most craftswomen could
               identify with some aspects of all of these philosophies.







                                                                          Constructing Craft
   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258