Page 292 - Constructing Craft
P. 292

The Coupe de Grâce

               The review of the needs of craftspeople commissioned by the Arts Council was

               undertaken by Albert Stafford, an independent consultant.  At first it appeared to be a

               review of the ‘craft sector’, but it soon became apparent that certain parts of the craft
               sector would be under closer scrutiny. Stafford set up meetings with craftspeople,

               educators and administrators throughout New Zealand. Despite this apparently
               inclusive approach however, the use of the term ‘craft artist’ by Stafford,  rather than

               the words ‘craft’ and ‘craftsperson’, as used in the Terms of Reference, suggested
               that the final conclusions might have been already decided. In the final report

               Stafford briefly responded to the combining of craft and art:

                        Some  craftspeople  have  strongly  put  forward  the  need  for  a
                        generic  group  for  craft.  After  raising  the  art-craft  issue  with
                        numerous  craftspeople  throughout  the  country  we  consider  it
                        counter-productive  to  get  drawn  into  the  philosophical
                                                                                     30
                        arguments both for and against the separation of the two.


               The consultation process also emphasized the divisions that had developed within
               the crafts movement. Stafford divided ‘Professional Craft Artist[s] (Full-Time)’ from

               ‘Professional Craft Artist/Design Tutor[s]’ because the former insisted that, unlike the

               latter, ‘they didn’t have the backstop safeguard of secure income from an alternative
                        31
               source.’  The tutors disputed this claim, saying that many craft artists also had
               alternative incomes. But Stafford noted that the separate classifications had shown
               up the different needs of each group. The craft artists wanted marketing of craft to be

               a priority and also some accountability in the way that grants were made. Tutors,

               who resented their ‘lower ranking’ when compared to craft artists, wanted more
               grants and more emphasis on education. However, always in the background was
                                                                                     32
               the issue of lack of representation and the declining membership.


               The Stafford Report recommended terminating the funding of the CCNZ and the
               establishment of an Arts and Crafts Development Board (ACDB). Ominously, for the

               craft sector, the ACDB would have a much larger constituency – all visual artists. The

               interim committee of the ACDB, called, from early 1993, the Visual Arts Marketing
               Board, met under the chairmanship of Albert Stafford. With no national craft



                                                                          Constructing Craft
   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297