Page 294 - Constructing Craft
P. 294

have  been  a  way  in  which  individuals  with  non-practising
                        interests  in  the  crafts  could  contribute,  keep  in  touch  and  be
                                                                     38
                        involved in supporting and promoting craft.


               Ewing’s description of the CCNZ emphasised its limited appeal to most craftspeople.
               The majority of craftspeople in New Zealand felt no affinity with the CCNZ and, with

               its small membership base, it was vulnerable.




               Failure and Success


               Comparing the CCNZ with its British counterpart reveals why one organisation

               collapsed while the other continued to prosper well into the future. Neither the BCC

               nor the CCNZ catered for the full range of craftspeople that populated their craft
               worlds because, as Danto noted, the community they existed in could not agree on

               what craft was. In Britain the BCC recognised this and targeted its resources towards
               education ‒ the craft artists of the future ‒ and promoting craft art while still

               acknowledging where this new work had come from. The BCC portrayed itself as
               both the guardian of Britain’s craft heritage and the leader of contemporary craft

               artists even if, in practical terms, it gave more support to the latter. The BCC had

               enhanced its status in the wider community by becoming involved in aspects of
               education at all levels in Britain and it nurtured and funded a new generation of

               tertiary-trained artist craftsmen and women who could see a future in education and
                                                                                               39
               as practising craft artists. It set up structures, for example its Royal Charter,  that
               gave it credibility and through influential supporters it became the recognised

               authority on craft art in Britain. The BCC had, over time, also built up a level of
               support that could not be numerically defined in the same way as the CCNZ’s

               membership database. Its constituency could not be as clearly classified as the
               CCNZ’s, therefore, theoretically, its ‘members’ were ‘all’ craftspeople even if many

               had no direct link to the organisation.


               The CCNZ, notionally, continued to attempt to directly serve all craftspeople

               throughout the 1980s and early 1990s. The CCNZ had been most effective and
               popular when it was assisting craftspeople in their fight against restrictive

               government regulations and laws ‒ particularly when they had no other organisations

                                                                          Constructing Craft
   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299