Page 73 - Constructing Craft
P. 73

By the 1980s it was clear that many craftspeople in New Zealand were making ‘art’

               rather than ‘craft’. Craft leaders even sought to reassure craftspeople who were
               concerned about this trend. Bob Heatherbell, the Vice-President of the New

               Zealand Society of Potters (NZSP), wrote in 1986: ‘Potters whose only interest is
               domestic ware may be suspicious of this flirtation with the arts but they can rest

                                                          7
               assured that they are far from forgotten.’  Heatherbell’s reassurance however,
               hinted that craftspeople were divided. Increasingly, the ‘craft’ for sale in shops or on

               display in art galleries and museums did not appear to serve the traditional roles of

               craft. Some commentators described this shift in emphasis as the ‘ethic of freedom
                              8
               from function’.   The Australian craft writer, Grace Cochrane, recognised this trend
               as a paradigm shift for the crafts.

                        Following  the  lead  of  the  visual  artists  of  the  time,  ...
                        [craftspeople]  denied  many  of  the  previously  agreed  central
                        ideals  of  crafts  practice:  valuing  skill  in  the  use  of  hands and
                        tools,  taking  pleasure  in  working  with  materials,  seeing  the
                        validity  of  function  as  a  purpose  for  production  and
                        acknowledging the legitimacy of working for a client.... In doing
                        so,  while  certainly  changing  and  overturning  conservative
                        perceptions about what the crafts might be, they set in train the
                        beginnings  of  a  denial  of  their  own  social  and  technological
                                              9
                        histories and values.

               Cochrane was acknowledging that craftspeople had conceded that their craft had to

               embrace the attributes that identified it as art using conventional art terminology.
               Defining and restraining craft became a persistent source of conflict both within the

               movement and from sources outside. The position taken was often linked to the

               place that the protagonists occupied within the art/craft field and to wider social,
               political, cultural and economic concerns. Craftspeople relied on ‘outsiders’ to define

               craft. This remained a persistent problem for a movement that lacked a legitimating

               authority.


               Aesthetic and Technical Distinctions


               Earlier Ideas about Art and Craft

               As more craftspeople began to call themselves craft artists and more students

               entered the new craft design programmes that began in the 1980s the differences

               between art and craft, as defined by philosophers and scholars, began to become

                                                                          Constructing Craft
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78